• Site Search
  • Lawyer Search

Miriam A. Vogel

Senior Of Counsel
Los Angeles, (213) 892-5929
  • Print PDF
  • Subscribe to RSS
  • MoFolder

Miriam Vogel is Senior Of Counsel in the firm's Los Angeles office, and is a member of the Appellate Practice Group.  Ms. Vogel has concentrated her practice on civil litigation for more than 30 years. Her principal work has focused on appellate litigation, as an appellate judge for 18 years and in private practice as an appellate advocate. Ms. Vogel currently represents major corporations and individuals in their appellate matters. She is a member of the California Academy of Appellate Lawyers and serves on the Ninth Circuit Advisory Board.

In a precedent setting decision for sales tax class actions, Ms. Vogel obtained a significant victory for our client, Target Corporation, before the California Court of Appeal.  Division Three of the Second Appellate District held that the California Constitution and state laws preclude consumers from asserting civil class action claims against retailers based on the allegedly improper collection of state sales tax reimbursement. The Court of Appeal's decision in Loeffler was a victory not just for Target, but also for retailers throughout California, as the decision (if affirmed by the California Supreme Court, where it is presently pending) will be relied on by trial courts as a basis for dismissing sales tax class action litigation currently pending against many other retailers in California.

For Ralphs Grocery Company, in two cases stemming from an attempt by Ralphs to implement rules restricting the time, place, and manner of picketing by a union at two of its Foods Co. stores, Ms. Vogel obtained two appellate opinions (in the Third and Fifth Districts of the California Court of Appeal) declaring the Moscone Act (which deprives state courts jurisdiction to enjoin peaceful picketing involving a labor dispute) and another statute constitutionally infirm. Both cases are presently pending before the California Supreme Court.

Before joining Morrison & Foerster in August 2008, Ms. Vogel was a Justice on the California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division One.  She authored more than 2,800 opinions and heard more than 8,400 cases. Among her 274 published opinions are a number that have helped reshape California's legal landscape, from major business matters such as insurance coverage, creditor claims stemming from bank failures, employment discrimination, and advertising practices to social issues involving privacy, child welfare, indigent representation, and wrongful death. Ms. Vogel also authored a series of rulings delineating the scope of property owner liability for harm caused by third-party criminal acts.  Ms. Vogel was appointed to the appellate court in 1990 by Gov. George Deukmejian after serving five years as a judge on the Los Angeles Superior Court.

Ms. Vogel is recommended as a leading lawyer by Chambers USA 2013, Legal 500 US 2013, and Best Lawyers in America 2013. The Daily Journal named her one of California's top 75 female litigators in 2011 and 2012.

 

Representative Opinions Authored as a Court of Appeal Justice:

Casden Park La Brea Retail LLC v. Ross Dress for Less, Inc. (2008) 162 Cal.App.4th 468 – Sufficiency of a neutral arbitrator’s disclosures in a rent dispute arbitration between a commercial landlord and tenant.

Estrada v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (2007) 154 Cal.App.4th 1 – Drivers’ class action against FedEx claiming that, for purpose of their entitlement to reimbursement for work-related expenses, they were employees, not independent contractors.

TBG Insurance Services Corporation v. Superior Court (2002) 96 Cal.App.4th 443 – An employee who agreed in writing that his employer-provided computers could be monitored by his employer had no reasonable expectation of privacy when he used the computer for personal matters.

Thrifty Oil Co. v. Superior Court (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 1070, review denied, Dec. 12, 2001 – A class action against a retailer who sold gasoline, holding that a two-tier pricing system, one price for cash, another for credit cards, was a permissible discount, not an unlawful surcharge.

Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. State Board of Equalization (1997) 53 Cal.App.4th 289 – A tax case in which the question was whether a partially built oil drilling platform was "delivered" to its purchaser when the original builder’s cost overruns and other construction problems required a mid-construction switch to a new builder.

Sunburst Bank v. Executive Life Insurance Company (1994) 24 Cal.App.4th 1156, review denied, Aug. 18, 1994, Certiorari Denied byNationsBank of Texas, N.A. v. Executive Life Ins. Co. (1995) 513 U.S. 1147 – Dispute between failed insurance company’s conservator and failed banks’ successors regarding municipal-bond-guaranteed-investment contracts sold by the insurance company to the two banks.

Ralphs Grocery Company v. United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 8 (Court of Appeal, Third and Fifth Appellate Districts.)
Secured two appellate court wins for Ralphs Grocery Company.  The cases stem from an attempt in January 2008 by Ralphs to implement rules restricting the time, place, and manner of so-called “expressive activities” outside its nonunion Foods Co. warehouse stores — rules that were ignored by union picketers.  In the Sacramento and Fresno Superior Courts, Ralphs challenged the constitutionality of California’s 1975 Moscone Act, which deprives state courts of jurisdiction to issue injunctions against peaceful picketing or patrolling involving any labor dispute.  The lawsuits also challenged Labor Code Section 1131.8, which independently imposes severe restrictions on a property owner's right to obtain injunctive relief against unions.   On Ralphs’ appeals from orders denying injunctive relief, the Third and Fifth Appellate Districts both held that the statutes violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution and, therefore, were invalid.  Both cases are presently pending before the California Supreme Court.
Sevidal v. Target Corporation
(Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District). Represented Target in consumer class action claiming Target’s website had misidentified certain items as made in the USA when in fact they were not; we defeated the plaintiff’s motion to certify a class and the Court of Appeal affirmed.
General Mills, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Franchise Tax Board
(First Appellate District). An appeal challenging the manner in which the Franchise Tax Board determined the portion of General Mills' total income that California is entitled to tax.
Nextel Boost of California v. City of Los Angeles
(Los Angeles Superior Court). Representing Boost and Sprint Telephony PCS, L.P., in an action challenging the City’s imposing of a use tax on prepaid cell phones and calling cards.
Loading...
Loading...