• Site Search
  • Lawyer Search

Peter J. Stern

Partner
San Francisco, (415) 268-6250
  • Print PDF
  • Subscribe to RSS
  • MoFolder

Peter Stern is a partner in the firm’s Intellectual Property Group. Mr. Stern has a general commercial practice with an emphasis on intellectual property litigation and counseling. His experience in patent matters includes adversarial licensing and all phases of litigation. He has litigated or arbitrated numerous commercial disputes in the fields of contract, licensing, and trade secret misappropriation. He also has an active practice in internal investigations involving the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, primarily in Asia.

Mr. Stern has handled several high-profile engagements for corporate defendants and pro bono plaintiffs under the Alien Tort Statute, a federal statute that permits certain claims based on violations of international law. He has counseled clients in the field of corporate social responsibility, and has served as a member of the Steering Committee of BASESwiki, a dispute resolution initiative of the U.N. Secretary-General’s Special Representative on Business and Human Rights.

Mr. Stern’s experience includes over 10 years in the litigation department of the firm’s Tokyo office. He has been ranked by Chambers Asia-Pacific as a “Leading Individual” in the field of Intellectual Property and listed by Best Lawyers in the categories of both Intellectual Property and Litigation.

Mr. Stern received his B.A., Phi Beta Kappa and summa cum laude, from Amherst College in 1985, and his M.A. in history from the University of California, Berkeley, in 1988. He received his J.D. from the University of California, Berkeley, Boalt Hall School of Law, in 1992, where he was Articles Editor of the California Law Review. Following graduation, Mr. Stern served as law clerk to Judge John T. Noonan, Jr., of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco.

Mr. Stern joined Morrison & Foerster’s Litigation Department in 1994, and was elected to the partnership in fall 2000. In 1992-93, he studied at the Inter-University Center for Japanese Language Studies in Yokohama, Japan.

Smartphone Litigation
Member of team that successfully tried a high-profile smartphone case leading to a jury verdict of over $1 billion.
Pioneer v. Samsung
(Eastern District of Texas). Represented plaintiff Pioneer in patent litigation relating to plasma display panels. Pioneer won a $69 million verdict at trial, including a finding of willful infringement.
Nikon Corp. v. ASML
(Northern District of California). Represented plaintiff Nikon Corp. in obtaining a $145 million settlement from its chief competitor in the photolithography industry after patent litigation in multiple jurisdictions.
Electro Scientific Industries v. General Scanning, Inc.
(Northern District of California). Part of the trial team that helped plaintiff Electro Scientific Industries, Inc., win a $13 million jury verdict in patent litigation against its chief competitor in the field of memory repair. The judgment was affirmed on appeal. 247 F.3d 1341 (Federal Circuit 2001).
TDK Corp. Arbitrations
(Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre). Led TDK Corp. and its subsidiaries in successfully resolving two separate commercial arbitrations before the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre involving contract and warranty issues.
Sarei v. Rio Tinto
(Central District of California). Obtained dismissal of all claims for defendant Rio Tinto plc, a global mining company, which was alleged to have violated international law under the Alien Tort Statue, in relation to the operation of one of its mines. Reported decisions include 221 F. Supp. 2d 1116 (Central District of California 2002), and 550 F.3d 822 (Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals 2008) (en banc).
Romagoza v. Garcia
(Southern District of Florida). Served as co-lead counsel for plaintiffs in this widely-publicized human rights case, in which a Florida jury found two former military leaders of El Salvador liable for $54.6 million in damages to three torture victims of that country. This verdict appeared on The National Law Journal’s list of the top 100 verdicts of the year, and was subsequently affirmed in an appeal that Mr. Stern argued before the Eleventh Circuit. 434 F.3d 1254.
Loading...
Loading...