Certain Sintered Rare Earth Magnets, Methods of Making Same, and Products Containing Same
(United States International Trade Commission) Lead counsel for Hitachi Metals against over thirty respondents in a multi-patent case pertaining to the composition and manufacture of rare earth magnets.
Certain Electronic Imaging Devices
(United States International Trade Commission) Lead counsel for Huawei Technologies in patent infringement case involving mobile imaging technology used in handsets, tablets, and other mobile devices.
MediaTek Inc. v. Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
(Northern District of California) Lead counsel for Freescale against MediaTek in this multi-patent case involving semiconductor bus arbitration technology and power management technology.
Certain Light-Emitting Diodes and Products Containing Same
(United States International Trade Commission and District of Delaware) Lead counsel for Osram against Samsung. These multi-patent cases, which involve LED technology, include both offensive and defensive actions.
Certain Semiconductor Chips and Products Containing Same
(United States International Trade Commission) Lead counsel for Hitachi Global Storage Systems against Rambus. This six-patent case initiated by Rambus involves DRAM controller and host interface technology.
Advanced Display Technologies of Texas, LLC v. Sharp Corp., et al.
(Eastern District of Texas) Counsel for Sharp in this multi-patent case brought by Advanced Display Technologies. The case involves LCD panel technology.
Certain Liquid Crystal Display Devices, Including Monitors, Televisions, and Modules, and Components Thereof
(United States International Trade Commission) Lead counsel for Thomson against Chimei Innolux, Qisda, BenQ, MStar Semiconductor, and Realtek Semiconductor. This multi-patent case involves LCD panel and LCD controller technology.
Certain Articulated Coordinate Measuring Arms and Components Thereof
(United States International Trade Commission) Lead counsel for Metris against Hexagon Metrology. This case, which was brought by Hexagon Metrology, involves precise, computer-driven measuring systems.
Baltimore Aircoil Co., Inc. v. Evapco, Inc.
(District of Maryland) Lead counsel for Evapco in this multi-patent suit involving industrial heat exchange technology. This case was initiated by Baltimore Aircoil.
Enhanced Security Research, LLC v. Sourcefire, Inc.
(District of Delaware) Lead counsel for Sourcefire in this multi-patent suit initiated by Enhanced Security Research. The case involves computer network security software.
Certain Semiconductor Chips With Minimized Chip Package Size and Products Containing Same
(United States International Trade Commission) Lead counsel for Spansion against Tessera. Successfully argued and obtained a stay, based on parallel re-examination proceedings, from the trial judge in this multi-patent semiconductor chip case.
Clearwater Systems Corp. v. EVAPCO, Inc.
(District of Connecticut) Lead patent counsel for Evapco against Clearwater in this multi-patent case on non-chemical, electronic water treatment technology. After obtaining a favorable Markman ruling, obtained summary judgment of non-infringement on one asserted patent and summary judgment of invalidity on the other asserted patent.
Certain Baseband Processor Chips and Chipsets, Transmitter and Receiver (Radio) Chips, Power Control Chips, and Products Containing Same, Including Cellular Telephone Handsets
(United States International Trade Commission) Represented Broadcom in connection with this multi-patent action. The matter involved cellular chipset technology.
Fastenetix, LLC v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.
(District of New Jersey) Lead patent counsel for Fastenetix. Represented Fastenetix against Medtronic in this high-stakes, multi-patent case on pedicle screw spine implant technology, and obtained a favorable Markman order for Fastenetix. The case successfully settled for $125 Million for Fastenetix after the Markman order issued and prior to trial.
Matsushita Electrical Industrial Co., Ltd. v. CMC Magnetics Corp., HotanCorp., KHyperMediaCorp.
(Northern District of California) Lead counsel for CMC Magnetics, Hotan, and KHyperMedia in the United States District Court, Northern District of California. Successfully defended CMC Magnetics, Hotan, and KHyperMedia in a three patent suit brought by Matsushita on recordable and rewritable optical disc technology. The case settled favorably for the defendants.
TimeCertain, LLC v. AuthentiDateHolding Corp. and AuthentiDate, Inc.
(Middle District of Florida) Lead counsel for AuthentiDate. Successfully defended AuthentiDate in a multi-patent suit against TimeCertain. Obtained a Markman order dispositive of non-infringement that led to a successful settlement. The case involved software cryptography technology.
Certain Color Television Receivers and Color Display Monitors and Components Thereof
(United States International Trade Commission) Lead trial counsel for Thomson. Successfully prosecuted patent infringement claims through a full trial in a multi-patent suit against BenQ Corporation and AU Optronics Corporation. The case settled favorably for Thomson before a decision issued. The case involved LCD panel processing and circuitry technology.
Certain Display Controllers and Products Containing Same
(United States International Trade Commission) Lead counsel for Genesis Microchip. Successfully prosecuted patent infringement claims against MStar Semiconductor, Inc. and Media Reality Technologies, Inc. through a full trial. Obtained an exclusion order after the administrative law judge's decision was reviewed and adopted by the full Commission. The case involved semiconductor and LCD panel controller technology.
Certain Recordable Compact Discs and Rewritable Compact Discs
(United States International Trade Commission) Lead counsel for Princo Corporation, Gigastorage Corporation, and Linberg Enterprises. Successfully employed an antitrust-based patent misuse defense to defend Princo, Gigastorage, and Linberg against patent infringement claims of Philips. All six of the patents that Philips asserted were deemed unenforceable, and were part of a billion-dollar patent pool. The ITC declined to issue an exclusion order against Princo, Gigastorage, and Linberg after the administrative law judge's decision was reviewed and adopted by the full Commission. The case involved optical storage medium and CD-R and CD-RW technology.
Intel Corp. v. Broadcom Corp.
(District of Delaware) Represented Intel. Successfully prosecuted patent infringement claims against Broadcom. This case settled and involved standard setting defenses and semiconductor packaging technology.
Atmel Corp. v. STMicroelectronics, Inc.
(District of Delaware) Represented Atmel against STMicroelectronics. A total of 17 patents involving memory and microcontroller chips were asserted in both cases. Cases settled favorably.
Certain Semiconductor Timing Signal Generator Devices, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same AND Certain Power Saving Integrated Circuits and Products Containing Same
(United States International Trade Commission) Successfully represented Cypress Semiconductor as patentee/complainant and respondent against Integrated Circuit Systems. One of the two ICS patents at issue was eliminated from the case as a result of a summary determination motion. The case settled favorably for Cypress, as, among other things, ICS agreed to stop selling an entire line of products. The case involved standard-setting defenses and semiconductor and phase-lock loop (PLL) technology.
Certain Integrated Repeaters, Switches, Transceivers and Products Containing Same
(United States International Trade Commission) Successfully prosecuted patent infringement claims for Intel against Altima Communications through a full trial. Lead lawyer for Intel on the patent that covered most of the Altima products at issue. Obtained an exclusion order covering each of those products at issue. The case involved semiconductor technology and the patent for which Mr. Hadjis was responsible involved semiconductor packaging technology.
Altima Communications, Inc. v. Intel Corporation
(Northern District of California) Lead counsel for Intel. Successfully prosecuted patent infringement claims for Intel against Altima Communications. This case settled and involved semiconductor packaging technology.
Atmel Corp. v. STMicroelectronics, Inc. (D. Del.) and STMicroelectronics, Inc. v. Atmel Corp. (N.D. Tex.)
(Northern District of Texas) Represented Atmel against STMicroelectronics. A total of 17 patents involving memory and microcontroller chips were asserted in both cases. Cases settled favorably.
Telecom Technical Servs. v. Siemens Rolm Communications
(Northern District of Georgia) Successfully defended Siemens against Kodak based on antitrust claims brought by an independent service organizations and asserted multiple patents against the ISOs. The case was decided in favor of Siemens on summary judgment. This case involved telecommunications and PBX technology.
PMC and Gemstar v. Scientific Atlanta
(Northern District of Georgia) Prosecuted patent infringement claims for Gemstar against Scientific Atlanta in a seven-patent case involving cable set-top box and media broadcasting technology.
Certain SDRAMs, DRAMs, ASICs, RAM-and-Logic Chips, Microprocessors, Microcontrollers, Processes for Manufacturing Same, and Products Containing Same
(United States International Trade Commission) Successfully prosecuted patent infringement claims through a full trial. The case settled favorably for the client before the administrative law judge issued a decision. The case involved semiconductor and memory technology.
Xerox Corp. v. Mita Copystar Am. Inc.
(Northern District of New York) Represented Xerox. Prosecuted multiple xerography patents against Mita. Case settled favorably.
AshaCorp. v. Dana Corp.
(Eastern District of Michigan) Defended Dana against Asha. Patent and breach of contract case involving automotive component and limited slip differential technology.
MCI Corp. v. AT&T Am. Transtech, Inc.
(Eastern District of Pennsylvania) Defended Cincinnati Bell against MCI. Multi-patent case involving telecommunications technology. Case settled favorably.
Premier Networks v. Quest
(Northern District of Illinois) Defended Quest against Premier Networks. Multi-patent case involving telecommunications technology.