• Site Search
  • Lawyer Search

Chris J. Carr

Partner
San Francisco, (415) 268-7246
  • Print PDF
  • Subscribe to RSS
  • MoFolder

Chris Carr is co-chair of the firm's Cleantech Group and chair of the firm's Environment and Energy Group. Mr. Carr has focused his practice on permitting and litigation under the federal Endangered Species Act, the Clean Water Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, and their California counterparts.

Mr. Carr frequently defends "citizen suits" brought under various federal environmental statutes and litigates challenges to environmental permits, approvals, and review documents in federal and state courts. His clients include public agencies, land developers, private individuals, nonprofits, and business concerns in the water, energy, timber, mining, agricultural, fishing, construction, manufacturing, and wine industries.

Mr. Carr advises and represents clients in permitting, investigations, and administrative proceedings by federal and state environmental, natural resource, and land management agencies. The federal agencies include the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, NOAA Fisheries (formerly National Marine Fisheries Service), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Bureau of Land Management, and the U.S. Forest Service. The California state agencies include the California Department of Fish and Game, the California Fish and Game Commission, Regional Water Quality Control Boards, the State Water Resources Control Board, the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, and the California Board of Forestry.

Mr. Carr serves on the City of San Francisco's Clean Technology Advisory Council, the Wine Institute's Public Policy Committee, the California Forestry Association's Legal Affairs Committee, and the California Construction and Industrial Materials Association's Environment Committee.  He also serves on the National Advisory Council of the Institute of Governmental Studies at U.C. Berkeley.

Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
Represent the nation's largest provider of treated drinking water in litigation challenging Biological Opinions issued by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service restricting operation of the State Water Project.
Northern California River Watch v. California Department of Fish and Game
Obtained summary judgment dismissal of a federal Endangered Species Act citizen suit alleging that a housing developer and the California Department of Fish and Game violated the plant protection provisions of the Act. The Ninth Circuit affirmed in a published decision, 620 F.3d 1075 (9th Cir. 2010). 
NextLight Renewable Resources LLC
Advise NextLight with respect to protected species, wetlands and water quality permitting for solar energy site development
Pacific Forest and Watershed Lands Stewardship Council
Advise the Stewardship Council on the legal requirements for the development and implementation of a Land Conservation Plan for PG&E lands to promote beneficial public values, including California Environmental Quality Act compliance by California Public Utilities Commission, BLM and USFS authorities to enter into land transactions, and California conservation easement and real property law.
California Forestry Association
Serve as outside counsel to California's timber industry trade association on environmental regulatory and litigation matters.
Wild Equity Institute v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
Defeated preliminary injunction and summary judgment motions that threatened to shut down the historic Sharp Park Golf Course, working pro-bono on behalf of the nonprofit defendant-intervenor San Francisco Public Golf Alliance (SFPGA). Environmental advocacy groups, led by the Center for Biological Diversity and the Wild Equity Institute, filed a lawsuit against the City and County of San Francisco seeking to shut down the Golf Course, alleging impacts to the California red-legged frog and San Francisco garter snake, both listed under the federal Endangered Species Act. Succeeded in getting the lawsuit dismissed after a U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Biological Opinion substantiated our argument that extensive studies and expert scientific analysis support the claim that protected species and public golf can (and, indeed, do) enjoy a symbiotic relationship.
Loading...
Loading...