• Site Search
  • Lawyer Search

Class Actions

  • Print PDF
  • Subscribe to RSS
  • MoFolder

Representative Experience

Gap Inc.
We secured a victory for Gap in an identity theft class action case filed by a former job applicant who made claims against the retailer after a third-party vendor's laptop was stolen, containing personal data. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California held the clothing retailer was not negligent in its handling of the data, and granted summary judgment to Gap, as well as to third-party vendor Vangent Inc., dismissing negligence claims.
In re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation
We are representing a major financial institution in an MDL proceeding that consists of 1) a class action brought on behalf of every merchant in the United States who accepts Visa and MasterCard payment cards alleging price-fixing and tying claims and 2) more than 10 actions by a number of large merchants making parallel claims. Fact discovery is complete. Motions to dismiss and motions for class certification are pending. We also are representing the same financial institution in several other payment card antitrust cases.
JDS Uniphase
After a four-week jury trial, we won a defense verdict on behalf of JDSU and three former executives on all claims in a class action alleging securities fraud and insider trading. Plaintiffs had sought damages of approximately $20 billion, one of the largest damages claims ever presented at trial in the United States.
McKesson Corporation
We represented McKesson in a nationwide RICO class action lawsuit alleging unlawful price fixing to inflate the average wholesale price of hundreds of brand name prescription drugs. We obtained dismissal at the pleading stage, demonstrating that plaintiffs failed to allege any anticompetitive effect from the alleged conduct.
Digital Media Company Privacy Class Action Litigation
Defended digital media company in privacy class actions alleging email content was scanned to develop targeted advertising in violation of California state wiretapping laws.
Loading...
Loading...