EPOS Technologies, Ltd. v. Pegasus Technologies, Ltd.
(District of the District of Columbia). Won summary judgment of non-infringement in a declaratory relief patent action involving digital ultrasound pen technology.
In re Certain Electronic Imaging Devices
(International Trade Commission, 337-TA-850). Counsel for Huawei Technologies in patent infringement case involving mobile imaging technology used in handsets, tablets, and other mobile devices.
Amado v. Microsoft Corporation
(Central District of California, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit). Secured jury verdict for an individual inventor in a software patent infringement trial against Microsoft Corporation. Judgment of infringement was affirmed by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Norton v. Norton
(Los Angeles County Superior Court). Won a favorable decision in a protracted trial involving software development and copyright ownership, brand value, executive compensation, and business valuation.
Xilinx Inc. v. Altera Corporation
(Northern District of California, International Trade Commission, 337-TA-441). Successfully defended Altera Corporation in patent infringement trials in district court and the International Trade Commission involving programmable logic devices. The district court granted judgment to Altera, and a favorable settlement was reached before a post-trial decision was rendered by the judge in the ITC action.
Centillion Data Systems v. Qwest Corporation, et al.
(Southern District of Indiana, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit). Prevailed on summary judgment of patent noninfringement involving telephone billing systems. Case is pending after a Federal Circuit appeal.
Computer Cache Coherency Corporation v. Intel Corporation
(Northern District of California, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit). Prevailed on summary judgment of patent noninfringement involving interface circuits in multiprocessor systems. Affirmed by the Federal Circuit.
Angeion Corporation v. Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.
(District of Minnesota). Prevailed on summary judgment of patent infringement involving implantable defibrillator technology, and subsequently obtained a $35 million settlement.