Pioneer Corporation v. Samsung SDI, Ltd.
(Eastern District of Texas). Obtained a jury verdict of $59 million for Pioneer plus a finding of willful infringement by Samsung in a patent infringement case. The case involved plasma display technology.
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.
(Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit). Represented Sandoz in an appeal related to Copaxone, Teva’s $4 billion multiple sclerosis drug. Achieved victory when the Federal Circuit ruled that five of the nine patents covering Copaxone are invalid.
ICU Medical v. RyMed Technologies
(District of Delaware). Achieved a favorable jury verdict in a patent infringement case for our client ICU Medical. ICU alleged that RyMed infringed ICU’s patents related to needle free connectors for IV systems. The jury found that RyMed’s InVision Plus IV connector infringes two patents owned by ICU. ICU is a pioneer in this field and its patents and technology cover important and fundamental developments in the intravenous access device area.
Fujitsu Ltd. v. Samsung SDI Co. Ltd.
Co-lead counsel for litigation in ten jurisdictions globally including the Northern District of California, the Eastern District of Virginia, the International Trade Commission (ITC), Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom. Both ITC proceedings went through hearings. Cases settled after hearings through cross license in favor of Fujitsu.