• Site Search
  • Lawyer Search

Matthew I. Kreeger

Partner
San Francisco, (415) 268-6467
  • Print PDF
  • Subscribe to RSS
  • MoFolder

Matt Kreeger is the Co-Chair of the firm's Patent Interferences Practice Group.  Mr. Kreeger specializes in helping clients find efficient, creative, business-oriented solutions to high stakes intellectual property disputes. Mr. Kreeger also helps develop patent prosecution and reexamination strategies that protect his clients' patents and minimize the clients' risks.

After one of his clients was sued for patent infringement, Mr. Kreeger obtained an early summary judgment of non-infringement, ending the case before significant expense. In another case, he obtained a claim construction ruling that convinced the other party to settle on favorable terms.

Mr. Kreeger has served as lead or co-lead counsel in more than 15 patent interferences, including one ground-breaking interference confirming that the client was the first to invent a test to screen for HIV antibodies used in blood banks throughout the world.

Mr. Kreeger also has represented clients in disability access cases, including the National Federation of the Blind against Target Corp. case. In the Target case, which recently settled, the plaintiffs alleged that Target violated the Americans with Disabilities Act and California state law by maintaining a web site that was not accessible to blind users.

Acacia Media Technologies Corp. v. Comcast Corp., et al.
(Northern District of California).  Represented EchoStar, the owner of the DISH Network, in a closely-watched patent infringement case involving a number of patents purportedly relating to digital media transmission. EchoStar was one of multiple defendants in this multi-district patent infringement action involving distributed audio/video information and whether major U.S. satellite and cable television providers infringe Acacia patents on video-on-demand (streaming video) technology. We assumed a leadership position in developing the defenses against these patents, which, if afforded the broad construction assigned to them by the patentees, could have far-reaching effects on numerous forms of digital transmission used in many different industries. After multiple rounds of claim construction proceedings, defendants prevailed on summary judgment of non-infringement and invalidity of all patents, which was affirmed by the Federal Circuit in 2010.
Loading...
Loading...