California Expands Its Security Breach Notification Law But Rejects Merchant Liability Standard
by
On October 13, 2007, Governor Schwarzenegger vetoed Assembly Bill 779, which would have regulated the handling of payment-related
data and imposed greater liability on merchants for data security breaches.[1] The following day, Governor Schwarzenegger signed Assembly Bill 1289, which expands California’s data breach notification
law to cover medical information and health insurance information. This article summarizes these new developments.
I. Governor Schwarzenegger’s Veto of AB 779
As explained in our September 27 update, AB 779 would have placed additional burdens on any person, business, or agency that
(a) sells goods or services to any resident of California; (b) accepts as payment a credit card, debit card, or other payment
device; and (c) is not already subject to regulatory oversight under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act’s rules about disclosure of
nonpublic personal information.[2] These obligations would have included enhanced data security standards, as well as liability for the breach notification
costs of a data “owner or licensee” that is required to give notice under California’s existing data breach notification law.
In vetoing AB 779, Governor Schwarzenegger acknowledged the need to protect consumers’ financial information. However, he
described AB 779 as an attempt “to legislate in an area where the marketplace has already assigned responsibilities and liabilities
that provide for the protection of consumers.”[3] He expressed concern that AB 779 “creates the potential for California law to be in conflict with private sector data security
standards,” such as the Payment Card Industry standards. Governor Schwarzenegger also criticized AB 779’s failure to provide
a clear definition of which business “owns” or “licenses” data. He commented that this ambiguity and the heightened data
security requirements would “drive up the costs of compliance, particularly for small businesses.” The Governor concluded
by encouraging the bill’s author and the payment card industry “to work together on a more balanced legislative approach”
addressing these concerns.
II. Expansion of Data Breach Law to Medical and Health Insurance Information
While vetoing AB 779, Governor Schwarzenegger has expanded California’s breach notification law by signing AB 1298. AB 1298
will add “health information” and “medical insurance information” to the categories of “personal information” covered by California’s
breach notification law.
California’s data breach notification law currently defines “personal information” as an individual’s first name or first
initial and last name in combination with any of the following data elements, when either the name or the data element is
not encrypted:
- Social Security number;
- Driver’s license number or California Identification Card number; or
- Account number or credit or debit card number, in combination with any required security code, access code, or password that
would permit access to the individual’s financial account.[4]
AB 1298 expands this definition by adding medical information and health insurance information to the list of covered data
elements:
- “Medical Information” is defined as “any information regarding an individual’s medical history, mental or physical condition,
or medical treatment or diagnosis by a health care professional.”[5]
- “Health Insurance Information” is defined as “an individual’s health insurance policy number or subscriber information number,
any unique identifier used by a health insurer to identify the individual, or any information in an individual’s application
and claims history, including any appeals records.”[6]
These provisions are not be limited to health care providers, but may affect any employer or other entity with computerized
employee benefits or other health data.
III. Other Effects of AB 1298
In addition to its effect on California’s breach notification law, AB 1298 expands California’s Confidentiality of Medical
Information Act to create a new category of entity subject to its limitations on the use and disclosure of medical information.
More specifically, AB 1298 amends the California Civil Code to provide that any business maintaining medical information for
use by individuals or health care providers in managing that information or receiving or providing medical diagnoses or treatment
is subject to the general requirements imposed on “providers of health care” by the Confidentiality of Medical Information
Act.[7] Among other things, this amendment subjects such businesses to the civil and criminal penalties prescribed by the Confidentiality
of Medical Information Act for improper uses and disclosures of medical information.[8]
AB 1298 also provides that, regardless of the existence of a security freeze, a consumer reporting agency may disclose public
record information lawfully obtained from an open public record to the extent otherwise permitted by law.[9]
IV. Preparing for AB 1298
If your company maintains personal information about California residents, you will want to consider taking the following
steps before AB 1298 takes effect on January 1, 2008:
A. Identify what types of computerized Medical Information or Health Insurance Information your company maintains, and consider
the business reasons for collecting and maintaining this data. Limiting the collection and retention of protected data helps
to reduce the risk and/or magnitude of a potential security breach.
B. Ensure that Medical Information and Health Insurance Information are protected by the same data security measures applied
to other personal information covered by the breach notification laws (such as Social Security numbers and credit card numbers).
C. Consider encryption of Medical Information, Health Insurance Information, and other personal information covered by the
breach notification laws. California’s breach notification laws and the majority of other state breach notification laws
provide an exemption or “safe harbor” for encrypted data.
D. Train your human resources personnel, IT personnel, and managers that Medical Information and Health Insurance Information
must be handled in the same manner as Social Security numbers and other personal information covered by the breach notification
laws.
E. Update your company’s breach response plan to explain that Medical Information and Health Insurance Information are now
covered information.
[2] See AB 779, Section 1724.4(c) (“This section shall not apply to any person or business subject to Sections 6801 to 6809, inclusive,
of Title 15 of the United States Code and state or federal statutes or regulations implementing those sections, if the person
or business is subject to compliance oversight by a state or federal regulatory agency with respect to those sections.”).
The cited provisions of the United States Code are found in the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, and regulate the disclosure of nonpublic
personal information by financial institutions.
[3] The Governor’s veto message is available at http://gov.ca.gov/pdf/press/2007bills/AB%20779%20Veto%20Message.pdf.
[4] See California Civil Code Section 1798.82(e).
[5] See AB 1298, amendments to Sections 1798.82(e)(4) and 1798.29(e)(4).
[6] See AB 1298, amendments to Sections 1798.82(e)(5) and 1798.29(e)(5).
[7]AB 1298, amendments to California Civil Code Section 56.06.
[8] AB 1298, amendments to California Civil Code Section 56.06(c).
[9] AB 1298, Cal. Civ. Code 1785.11.2(n).