SEC Expands Eligibility Requirements of Forms S-3 and F-3 to Include Smaller Reporting Companies
On December 11, 2007, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) approved the adoption of amendments (the “Amendments”)
to Form S-3 and Form F-3 (the “Forms”). The Amendments will increase the number of smaller public companies eligible to use
these Forms to register primary offerings of equity and unrated debt, and to use these forms to file a shelf registration
statement. Accordingly, these Amendments are expected to provide these companies with greater and more cost-effective access
to the public securities market.
The Amendments will enable a company that has less than $75 million in public equity float to register its primary securities
offerings on one of the Forms if it:
- meets the other eligibility requirements of the relevant Form;
- is not and has not been a shell company for at least 12 calendar months prior to the filing of the Form;
- has a class of common equity securities listed on a national securities exchange; and
- does not sell in a 12-month period more than the equivalent of one-third of its public float.
The SEC’s adopting release, which includes the text of the Amendments, may be found at: http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2007/33-8878.pdf.
I. Background and Purpose of Form S-3 and Form F-3.
Form S-3 is the “short form” that domestic issuers meeting certain requirements can use to register their securities with
the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Form F-3 is the corresponding form used by foreign
private issuers. The Forms can each incorporate by reference periodic reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), both before and after the effective date of the registration statement, which can reduce
the length of the registration statement considerably and eliminate the need for post-effective amendments to address developments
after the effective date. In addition, a company eligible to use the Forms may conduct primary offerings “off the shelf”
under Rule 415 of the Securities Act and may offer securities in one or more tranches. Companies using one of the Forms,
consequently, may expeditiously take down debt, equity and other securities.
II. Elimination of $75 Million Minimum Public Float Requirement.
Each Form currently requires that companies registering primary offerings have a public float of at least $75 million. The
$75 million public float requirement was initially designed to help protect investors by ensuring that only companies that
were widely followed in the market would obtain the benefit of registering their offerings on a short-form registration statement.
However, various developments, such as technology allowing the public to access SEC filings through EDGAR and company websites
over the Internet on a real-time basis, have minimized the need for this requirement.
By eliminating the $75 million threshold, the SEC estimates that approximately 1,400 additional smaller reporting companies
will now be eligible to use the Forms for primary offerings. This change will allow these companies to broaden their capital
raising strategies by providing them with an alternative to private financing transactions. For example, many of these companies
will now be able to offer their equity securities using a shelf registration statement in an underwritten public offering
or in the registered direct format, which may involve a smaller discount to market price than a PIPE or another form of private
placement.
III. Non-Shell Company Requirement.
The SEC noted in its adopting release that thinly traded securities are likely to be more vulnerable to potential manipulative
practices. To address this concern, the SEC’s new eligibility criteria for the Forms require that an issuer with a public
float of less than $75 million not be a “shell company” (which includes so-called “special purpose acquisition companies”
or SPACs), as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act, either at the time of filing or in the 12-month period prior to filing.
Former shell companies will also be subject to certain filing requirements in order to benefit from these Amendments, including
timely filing of their periodic reports for at least 12 months.
IV. Requirement to Have a Class of Common Equity Securities Listed on a National Securities Exchange.
For a company that does not have a $75 million public float to use one of the Forms for a primary offering, the Amendments
require the company to have a class of equity securities listed on a national securities exchange, such as the NYSE, the NASDAQ
Stock Market or the AMEX. The SEC’s rationale for this requirement is that there is likely to be an increased level of investor
protection if there is widely available evidence that there is a market for a company’s securities, and that the company has
the ability to comply with the rules of the exchange or exchanges on which its securities are listed. Accordingly, companies
that trade only in the “pink sheets” or on the “Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board” will not be able to use the Forms for primary
offerings.
V. Limit of Sales Equal to One-Third of a Company’s Public Float During 12 Consecutive Calendar Months.
In its June 2007 proposing release, the SEC proposed that a company be permitted to sell up to 20% of its public float in
primary offerings during any 12 consecutive months. Commentators, including Morrison & Foerster LLP, raised a number of objections
to the 20% cap. First, they expressed concern that the proposed 20% cap was an arbitrarily low ceiling that would not satisfy
the capital needs of smaller companies. Second, they argued that this 20% cap would discourage smaller companies from using
their new access to short-form registration, as the advantages of registering a relatively small amount of securities could
be outweighed by the disadvantages of the expense involved with filing and processing a registration statement. Third, they
noted that, traditionally, the SEC has not used a disclosure regulation, such as the registration forms under the Securities
Act, to address concerns about trading volume and the overall liquidity of markets, and therefore should not do so in this
instance. Additionally, commentators requested the SEC to reconcile the cap with its recent position that a resale registration
statement would generally not be available to register securities originally sold to investors in a PIPE, if those securities
exceeded one-third of the issuer’s public float. For these reasons and others, our firm and other commentators suggested
the SEC not adopt the 20% cap, or, at a minimum, set a higher cap. Accordingly, the SEC approved the adoption of a cap of
one-third of a company’s public float, noting that this threshold will allow for an offering that is large enough to help
a company raise a relatively significant amount of capital when market opportunities arise. Companies that seek to exceed
this cap would still be able to utilize other SEC forms, such as Form S-1 or Form F-1.
Under the Amendments, the determination of the issuer’s public float will be made immediately prior to the relevant sale,
and may be based on any date in the 60 days prior to the proposed sale. The price of all securities sold under the Form in
the previous 12 months, whether debt or equity, including those to be sold in the proposed sale, will be used to determine
whether the one-third cap has been exceeded. By calculating in this manner, an issuer’s ability to use its shelf may increase
or decrease during the life of the shelf, depending upon changes in its public float. Issuers that rely on this Amendment
to use the Forms will need to set forth on the front cover of the relevant prospectus the amount of the public float, and
the amount of securities offered in reliance on this rule.
The one-third cap will be removed if the issuer’s public float increases to $75 million after the effective date of the registration
statement. However, if the public float of the company falls below $75 million at the time that its next annual report is
filed, the cap will be reimposed. In contrast, companies that satisfy the $75 million threshold at the time the Form is filed
will not be subject to the one-third restriction, even if their public float falls below $75 million after the effective date.
In connection with the one-third cap, the Amendments revise the eligibility rules to provide that a violation of this restriction
will also violate the requirements as to using the proper registration form, even though the relevant registration statement
has already been declared effective. Prior to the Amendments, once a registration statement was declared effective, it would
be deemed to have been filed on the proper form.
* * *
Effectiveness of New Amendments.
The amendments will become effective on January 28, 2008.