by
Getting portfolio companies there and beyond
The last several months have seen both a significant increase in international appetite for initial public offerings in the
U.S. by Chinese companies, as well as some increasing wariness given recent disclosure issues that have arisen in connection
at least one recent offering. Companies such Linktone Ltd., which Morrison & Foerster LLP represented in its global IPO and
continues to represent in ongoing compliance and corporate work, have recently achieved high profile listings on Nasdaq or
the New York Stock Exchange.
In this environment, it is important for the board, management and in-house legal counsel of private companies planning their
IPOs, or of public companies thinking of spinning off and listing one or more subsidiaries, to consider the basic elements
which lay the groundwork for a successful IPO. Equally important, but sometimes overlooked in the excitement of the IPO process,
are the practical implications of being a U.S. public company in the long-term and how these issues can impact companies'
overall goals and resources -- and indeed affect the value at which a post-IPO exit for investors may be achieved. The following
summarizes some of the key issues at the pre- and post-IPO stages that we have seen arise in our recent work.
Venture capitalists play an important advisory role during this process since they are often in a position (as board members
and/or significant shareholders) to focus company management on these issues.
Pre-IPO
The obvious goal of any IPO is to complete the process in as short a period of time as reasonably possible, while concurrently
preparing public disclosure documents that are complete and accurate to minimize any potential liability. Achieving this goal
is often complicated by a number of IPO "hot buttons" which active venture capitalists can help company management to focus
on and overcome early:
- Accounting issues: encourage the company to appoint an internationally recognized auditor, identify key accounting issues early and agree on
scope of, and nature of the engagement for, the comfort letter. Accounting issues almost always affect the timing of IPOs. This is particularly true for companies with their principal
operations in China, where industry-specific business practices often give rise to unusual accounting issues. For example,
wireless value-added services provides in China engage in fairly complex revenue estimations due to the nature of the wireless
industry in China. Moreover, in this Sarbanes-Oxley era of heightened liability for securities offerings, increasing emphasis
is being placed on the scope of "comfort letters" which a company's auditor provides to the underwriters and the company's
board as part of its due diligence. A particularly sensitive issue in this regard is whether the auditor will require the
lead underwriter to sign an engagement letter for the provision of the comfort letter. The purpose of this letter is to define
the permissible use of the comfort letter and the auditor's liability in connection with issuing it.
- The company's "story": consider the "story" that will be presented to potential investors and make sure management and the board fully understand
and are able to effectively communicate this story as the road show nears. As illustrated by a recent IPO by a Chinese manufacturing company, statements by company management or its board that are
inconsistent with its IPO prospectus disclosure may be embarrassing and adversely affect the company's stock price. It could
also lead to potential liability under the U.S. securities laws.
- Management and board composition: identify positions in senior and middle management that may need to be upgraded/expanded and any necessary changes in board
composition. Encourage the company to take steps to identify any weaknesses in their current management team and fill-in any gaps that
may exist so that they can comply with the demands of the U.S. securities laws and listing rules. In addition, non-U.S. companies
will be subject next year to enhanced Nasdaq and New York Stock Exchange board composition rules which will require, among
other things, that a majority of the board be "independent." (This is in addition to the current requirement that all members
of audit committees must be independent directors, except in limited circumstances.) Companies operating in China may find
it challenging to locate suitable independent board members.
Post-IPO
Completing a successful IPO on Nasdaq or the New York Stock Exchange is always an exciting time for a company -- the prestige
of having made it on a high profile stock market, the press coverage and, most of all, the cash the company is suddenly sitting
on to expand its business. But before a company formally initiates an IPO process with underwriters, legal counsel and accountants,
it should give serious consideration to how it will maintain industry interest in its stock and maintain significant liquidity.
Venture capitalists, particularly those with investment banking experience, are an important source of advice (through its
board or shareholder status) on how a young company can seek to avoid the pitfalls of becoming a small cap stock with little
liquidity.
Specifically, companies need to be aware that there is a growing "orphanage" in the U.S. public markets, populated by companies
whose valuation is below the necessary threshold to command the attention of investment bank analysts, and, as a result, institutional
buyers, whose trades typically comprise the majority of trading volume for most companies listed on Nasdaq and the New York
Stock Exchange.
A company whose stock is "in the orphanage" is in a difficult situation. The expense and nuisance of public registration and
burdensome ongoing disclosure requirements is not counterbalanced by genuine liquidity or an accurate trading price which
real liquidity would bring. Moreover, a thinly traded stock tends to trade down. Stock that came public at a share price of,
say, $15, once fallen into the orphanage, may slip into single digits even though the company is doing just fine. This can
lead to ever-declining stock prices and trading volume which, in severe cases, may result in delisting.
We have seen companies follow this downward spiral, including a few which have bounced back dramatically such as NetEase.com,
an Internet portal operator in China and a client of our firm. NetEase.com went from an IPO price of $15.50 to subsequently
trading under $1 on Nasdaq and facing potential delisting in 2002, to trading well over $40 in recent quarters and the initiation
of analyst coverage by several investment banks.
To stay out of the orphanage, a company's management and board should be ready to commit themselves for the long-term to not
only growing the company and meeting analysts' expectations, but also to:
- maintaining a seasoned, international caliber management team that effectively communicates the company's message to analysts,
institutional investors and the public at large,
- working closely with outside counsel and other advisors, ideally in conjunction with an internal multi-department disclosure
committee of the company, in developing consistent public disclosure which accurately informs the public about material developments
regarding the company, without creating potential bases for future class action litigation in the U.S. (e.g., overly positive
forecasts of future product developments),
- developing a corporate culture that consistently adheres to the company's internal controls and procedures, and thereby helps
to minimize the possibility of an accounting restatement which is another red flag for U.S. class action litigation (including
against companies with operations in China, which is increasingly common), and
- causing management, the board and key board committees, in particular the audit committee, to allocate sufficient time in
working with outside legal counsel and auditors to ensure that the company's periodic public disclosure filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission is complete and accurate.