Max Olson

Max Olson
Partner

Shin-Marunouchi Building, 29th Floor

Tokyo, Japan 100-6529

aolson@mofo.com

81 3 3214 6522

REGIONS

Japan

BAR ADMISSIONS

New York

California

Japan (Gaikokuho-Jimu-Bengoshi)

EDUCATION

Harvard University, B.A.

Harvard University, M.A.

University of Michigan Law School, J.D.

Max Olson is a partner in the firm’s Intellectual Property Group and Litigation Department. Max’s practice includes all aspects of dispute resolution, with special emphasis on patent litigation, international arbitration, trade secret litigation, sports litigation, and adversarial patent license negotiations. Max served as the chair of the Tokyo office Litigation Department from 2006 to 2013 and managing partner of the Los Angeles office from 2004 through 2006.

Max led the firm’s litigation team on behalf of Fujitsu Semiconductor Ltd. (“FSL”) in obtaining an order from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California compelling arbitration of Cypress Semiconductor’s state court claims against FSL for alleged breach of contract, interference with contract, indemnity, and unfair competition in Tokyo, Japan, under the rules of the Japan Commercial Arbitration Association (FSL v. Cypress Semiconductor Corp., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97711 (N.D. Cal. June 5, 2023)).

Max led the firm’s patent litigation teams on behalf of JOLED Inc. in the global enforcement of its OLED display patents against Samsung’s Galaxy phones through parallel litigation in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas (Case No. 6:20-cv-559) and the Japan Customs Office. Max also led the firm’s patent litigation teams defending infringement actions brought by Samsung Display and/or its affiliate, Intellectual Keystone Technology, against JOLED and its customers, including ASUSTeK Computer Inc. and ASUS Computer Int’l, in ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-1257 (In re Certain Organic Light Emitting Diode Displays, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same) and in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas (Case Nos. 6:21-cv-00017 and 6:21‑cv‑00053).

Max led the firm’s litigation and arbitration teams on behalf of FSL in a global dispute with Cypress Semiconductor over the intellectual property rights in and ownership of thousands of photomasks used in the manufacture of semiconductors. Max defeated Cypress’s motion for injunctive relief in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in a significant victory for FSL (Cypress Semiconductor Corp. v. FSL, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32907 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 25, 2020)) and filed counterclaims against Cypress in an arbitration before the Japan Commercial Arbitration Association.

Max led the firm’s litigation team on behalf of Mitsui Chemicals in trade secret litigation involving irrigation systems in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida and won a motion to dismiss the unfair trade practices, unfair competition, fraud, and conspiracy claims brought against Mitsui Chemicals (Developmental Techs. LLC v. Mitsui Chems., Inc., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64630 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 15, 2019)).

Max represented U.S. Olympic gymnast Paul Hamm before the Court of Arbitration for Sport (“CAS”) in Switzerland, the world’s highest court for resolving sports disputes, in the highly publicized dispute over the gold medal in the men’s individual all-around event in the 2004 Summer Olympics in Athens. A panel of three CAS arbitrators rejected the appeal filed by the bronze medalist, Korean gymnast Yang Tae‑Young, and held unanimously that Mr. Hamm should keep his gold medal. Max also led the firm’s arbitration team on behalf of a mixed martial arts fighter and obtained an award from the Japan Commercial Arbitration Association releasing the fighter from an unfavorable contract with his promoter.

Max has also represented Fujitsu, FSL, Socionext, Konica Minolta, TDK, Yamaha, Micron Memory Japan, Advantest, Sega, Buffalo, and other major corporations in various adversarial patent license negotiations against some of the world’s largest patent holders.

Max is a longtime member of The Tokyo IP American Inn of Court and served as its President from 2021 through 2023. He is also a registered gaikokuho-jimu-bengoshi and a member of the Daini Tokyo Bar Association, the Litigation Section and Intellectual Property Law Section of the American Bar Association, and the American Intellectual Property Law Association.

Max is widely recognized as one of Japan’s leading lawyers by many of the world’s foremost independent legal directories, including Chambers GlobalChambers Asia-Pacific, The Legal 500, IAM Patent 1000, The Best Lawyers in Japan, Managing Intellectual Property, Benchmark Litigation: Asia-Pacific, Lexology Index (formerly Who’s Who Legal), and IAM Global Leaders. Clients describe Max as “a visionary legal practitioner and scholar who represents the best in his field in the Tokyo and Japan markets for dispute resolution and IP-related matters.”

Max received his M.A. and B.A. magna cum laude from Harvard University and his J.D. cum laude from the University of Michigan.

Experience

Encryptawave Technologies LLC v. Konica Minolta, Inc.

(Eastern District of Texas Case No. 4:24-cv-00588-SDJ). Represented Konica Minolta, Inc. in this patent infringement action involving wireless communication network security.

Omnitek Partners, LLC v. Citizen Watch Co. of America

(Southern District of New York Case No. 1:24-cv-00987-DLC). Represented Citizen Watch Co. of America in this patent infringement action involving solar wristwatches.

ACQIS LLC v. Fujitsu Ltd.

(Western District of Texas Case No. 6:23-cv-00878-ADA). Represented Fujitsu Ltd. in this 10-patent litigation involving computer technology. 

Fujitsu Semiconductor Ltd. v. Cypress Semiconductor Corp.

(Northern District of California Case No. 5:22-mc-80313-VKD). Obtained an order for Fujitsu Semiconductor Ltd. compelling arbitration of Cypress’s state court claims for alleged breach of contract, interference with contract, indemnity, and unfair competition in Tokyo, Japan, under the rules of the Japan Commerical Arbitration Association (Fujitsu Semiconductor Ltd. v. Cypress Semiconductor Corp., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97711 (N.D. Cal. June 5, 2023)). Press coverage: Fujitsu Wins Bid To Arbitrate Contract Breach Row In Japan, Law360, June 6, 2023.

In re Certain Electronic Devices and Semiconductor Devices with Timing-Aware Dummy Fill and Components Thereof

(ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-1319.) Represented respondents Socionext Inc. and Socionext America, Inc. in this ITC Section 337 investigation involving semiconductor design processes. The investigation was terminated without any relief being awarded.

Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. Socionext America, Inc.

(Eastern District of Michigan Case Nos. 2:22-cv-10906-GAD, -12018-GAD, -12749-GAD, and Northern District of California Case Nos. 4:23-cv-03116-YGR, -03117-YGR, -03118-YGR). Won motions on behalf of Socionext America, Inc. to transfer venue from the Eastern District of Michigan to the Northern District of California in these three patent infringement actions involving semiconductor design processes. Cases then dismissed with prejudice pursuant to licensing defenses (Bell Semiconductor, LLC. v. Socionext America, Inc., 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1933 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2024)).

JOLED Inc. v. Samsung Display Co., Ltd., et al.

(Western District of Texas Case No. 6:20-cv-00559-ADA). Represented JOLED Inc. in the enforcement of its OLED display patents against Samsung’s Galaxy phones.

In re Certain Organic Light-Emitting Diode Displays, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same

(ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-1257). Represented respondents JOLED Inc.ASUSTeK Computer Inc., and ASUS Computer International in this ITC Section 337 investigation involving OLED displays.

Samsung Display Co., Ltd. v. JOLED Inc. et al.

(Western District of Texas Case No. 6:21-cv-00017-ADA). Represented JOLED Inc. and its customer ASUSTeK Computer Inc. in this patent infringement action involving OLED display technology.

Intellectual Keystone Technology LLC v. JOLED Inc. et al.

(Western District of Texas Case No. 6:21-cv-00053‑ADA). Represented JOLED Inc. and its customer ASUSTeK Computer Inc. in this patent infringement action involving OLED display technology.

Cypress Semiconductor Corp. v. Fujitsu Semiconductor Ltd.

(Northern District of California Case No. 5:20-cv-00193-LHK and Japan Commercial Arbitration Association Case No. 20-06). Represented Fujitsu Semiconductor Ltd. (“FSL”) in this global dispute over the intellectual property rights in and ownership of thousands of photomasks used in the manufacture of semiconductors. Defeated Cypress’s motion for injunctive relief in a significant victory for FSL. (Cypress Semiconductor Corp. v. FSL, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32907 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 25, 2020)).

Computer Circuit Operations LLC v. Socionext Inc.

(Western District of Texas Case No. 6:20-cv-00046-ADA). Represented Socionext in this patent infringement action involving DDR controllers.

Developmental Techs., LLC v. Mitsui Chemicals, Inc., et al.

(Middle District of Florida Case No. 8:18-cv-01582-JDW). Represented Mitsui Chemicals, Inc. in this trade secret litigation involving irrigation systems. Brought successful motion to dismiss the unfair trade practices, unfair competition, fraud, and conspiracy claims (Developmental Techs., LLC v. Mitsui Chems., Inc., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64630 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 15, 2019)). Press coverage: Trade Secrets Suit Against Mitsui Severely Trimmed.

In re Certain Infotainment Systems, Components Thereof, and Automobiles Containing the Same

(ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-1119). Represented respondents Socionext Inc. and Socionext America, Inc. in this ITC Section 337 investigation involving systems-on-chips in automobile infotainment systems. ITC affirmed the Administrative Law Judge’s initial determination that none of the respondents violated Section 337.

USB Bridge Sols., LLC v. Buffalo Inc. et al.

(Western District of Texas Case No. 1:17-cv-01158-LY). Represented Buffalo Inc. in this patent infringement action involving storage devices. Claim nos. 11 – 15 of the patent-in-suit invalidated as indefinite during claim construction (USB Bridge Sols., LLC v. Buffalo Inc., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67678 (W.D. Tex. Apr. 17, 2020)).

Rankings

Recommended for Japan Intellectual Property and Intellectual Property - Patents

Lexology Index 2024 - 2025

Litigation Star in Japan

Benchmark Litigation Asia-Pacific 2025

Ranked in Japan for Litigation

IAM Patent 1000 2022-2025

Listed as a Global Leader in Japan

IAM Global Leaders (Recognized regularly since 2019)

Ranked in Japan: Dispute Resolution (International)

Chambers Global 2025

Band 1 for Japan: Intellectual Property (International)

Chambers Global 2025

Ranked in Japan: Dispute Resolution (International)

Chambers Asia-Pacific 2026

Band 1 for Japan: Intellectual Property (International)

Chambers Asia-Pacific 2026

Hall of Fame for Japan: Dispute Resolution (International)

The Legal 500 Asia Pacific 2025

Hall of Fame for Japan: Intellectual Property (International)

The Legal 500 Asia Pacific 2025

IP Star for Japan

Managing Intellectual Property (MIP) (Selected regularly since 2015)



Highly Recommended for Litigation

IAM Patent 1000 2021

Lawyer of the Year: International Arbitration

The Best Lawyers in Japan 2022

Intellectual Property Law; Litigation; International Arbitration; Criminal Defense

The Best Lawyers in Japan (Recognized since 2010)