Hector Gallegos is an experienced patent litigator with a proven record of prevailing in high stakes jury trials involving technologies, such as programmable logic devices, consumer software, infrared detectors, digital cameras, image sensors, and object recognition software.
Hector has successfully tried numerous patent cases and other complex disputes on behalf of leading technology companies in United States District Courts and before the International Trade Commission, and has represented clients before the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Hector’s effectiveness in advocacy on behalf of technology companies is bolstered by his technical education and seven years’ experience as an engineer with Hughes Aircraft Company, where he developed specific expertise designing and supervising design teams in the areas of computer hardware and software architecture, communication systems, digital and analog electronics, and digital signal processing. He holds undergraduate and graduate degrees in electrical engineering.
Hector was previously head of the firm’s Los Angeles Litigation Department. In his more than 25 years of practice, he has also successfully litigated and tried a broad range of complex business matters involving copyright infringement, software development disputes, misappropriation of trade secrets, brand value, executive compensation, and business valuation. Hector also has considerable experience with government contracts in the defense procurement area and has represented clients in connection with government investigations under the federal False Claims Act.
Active in several professional organizations, Hector served on the Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association’s Committee on Local Patent Rules for the Central District of California. He is a frequent speaker on intellectual property issues both in the United States and internationally. He has also served on the UCLA Law Alumni Board and is a trustee of the Mexican American Bar Foundation. From 2009 to 2012, Hector served on the Board of Commissioners for the Los Angeles Convention Center. He also maintains an active pro bono practice, and he was awarded the Pro Bono Civil Liberties Award by the ACLU Foundation of Southern California.Show More
(Central District of California). Secured jury verdicts on behalf of Nikon in two patent infringement trials involving digital camera technologies.
(District of Delaware). Represented PhishMe in patent litigation relating to network security technology against its direct competitor. Case terminated based on favorable settlement.
(Western District of Pennsylvania). Represented Toshiba defendants in patent infringement action involving hard disk drives. Case terminated based on favorable settlement.
(International Trade Commission, 337-TA-984). Represented Honda and Fujitsu Ten Respondents in patent-based ITC Section 337 investigation involving integrated circuits. Case terminated based on favorable settlement.
(ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-898). Led the firm’s patent litigation teams on behalf of Raymarine respondents in ITC Section 337 investigation involving sonar systems. Case terminated based on favorable settlement.
(International Trade Commission, 337-TA-850). Successfully defended Huawei Technologies through trial in a patent infringement case involving mobile imaging technology used in handsets, tablets, and other mobile devices. The Commission affirmed the determination of non-infringement.
(Central District of California, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit). Secured jury verdict in a software patent infringement trial against Microsoft Corporation. Judgment of infringement was affirmed by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
(Los Angeles County Superior Court). Won a favorable decision in a protracted trial involving software development and copyright ownership, brand value, executive compensation, and business valuation.
(Northern District of California, International Trade Commission, 337-TA-441). Successfully defended Altera Corporation in patent infringement trials in district court and the International Trade Commission involving programmable logic devices. The district court granted judgment to Altera, and a favorable settlement was reached before a post-trial decision was rendered by the judge in the ITC action.
(Southern District of Indiana, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit). Prevailed on summary judgment of patent non-infringement involving telephone billing systems.
(Northern District of California, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit). Prevailed on summary judgment of patent non-infringement involving interface circuits in multiprocessor systems. Affirmed by the Federal Circuit.
(District of Minnesota). Prevailed on summary judgment of patent infringement involving implantable defibrillator technology and subsequently obtained a $35 million settlement.