James R. Sigel

Partner | San Francisco

jsigel@mofo.com | (415) 268-6948

jsigel@mofo.com
(415) 268-6948

James Sigel is a partner in Morrison & Foerster’s Appellate and Supreme Court practice. James briefs and argues complex appeals for clients nationwide. He has particular experience in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and in the California state appellate courts, having argued more than a dozen times in those courts. Clients call him “wicked smart in understanding all the nuances of cases,” and say he “has this way of zeroing in on the heart of a case and reframing it so that your position becomes impossible to reject” (Chambers USA).

James has handled appeals in many areas of law, including class actions, securities, antitrust, contracts, false advertising, and environmental regulation. He has filed over a 100 briefs in federal and state appellate courts throughout the country, including the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the First, Second, Fourth, Seventh, Ninth, and D.C. Circuits, as well as the New York and California state courts.

James is an experienced appellate advocate on the west coast, where he clerked on both the Ninth Circuit and the California Supreme Court. His successful oral argument in the Ninth Circuit resulted in a victory for his client UPS in False Claims Act litigation that had been ongoing for more than a decade. Among James’s other victories, he has defeated multiple class actions against a leading consumer electronics corporation, secured a win for a major beverage company defending against a monopolization claim, and prevailed in another antitrust claim involving an alleged conspiracy in the shipment industry.

James has authored more than a dozen briefs in the U.S. Supreme Court on constitutional and statutory interpretation issues important to businesses. James led the briefing on two merits cases during a recent Supreme Court term: Thole v. U.S. Bank and Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Christian. Law360 named Thole as among the “biggest ERISA rulings” and Christian as one of the “biggest environmental law decisions” of the year.

James is the lead editor of Morrison & Foerster’s Left Coast Appeals blog, which keeps tabs on the Ninth Circuit and its decisions. And he serves on the Advisory Council of the Ninth Judicial Circuit Historical Society.

James maintains an active pro bono practice, having briefed and argued appeals involving constitutional, criminal, and immigration issues.

Before joining Morrison and Foerster, James clerked on the U.S. Supreme Court for Justice Sonia Sotomayor. Before the Supreme Court, James clerked for Judge David Tatel on the D.C. Circuit, Justice Goodwin Liu on the California Supreme Court, and Judge Stephen Reinhardt on the Ninth Circuit.

James graduated magna cum laude from Harvard Law School, where he was a Notes Editor of The Harvard Law Review. He received his undergraduate degree from Harvard College magna cum laude, with a Bachelor of Arts in Government and Economics.

Representative Appellate Arguments

  • U.S. ex rel. DeFatta v. UPS (15:22)
    (9th Cir.) Successfully argued and briefed appeal securing dismissal of False Claims Act lawsuit.
  • Kearney v. Foley & Lardner LLP (11:22)
    (9th Cir.) Argued and won victory in appeal ending long-running dispute over school district’s taking of private property.
  • John Russo Industrial Sheetmetal, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles Department of Airports
    (California, First District Court of Appeal) Argued and won judgment for airport authority in case challenging purported debarment of contractor.
  • Doe v. Kelly (0:00)
    (9th Cir.) Argued and secured affirmance of preliminary injunction requiring the federal government to improve conditions of confinement in Border Patrol detention centers.
  • Ezeokoli v. Uber Technologies, Inc. 
    (California, First District Court of Appeal) Briefed and argued appeal securing victory in Lanham Act false-advertising lawsuit.

Additional Representative Matters

  • Thole v. U. S. Bank, N. A.
    (U.S. S. Ct.) Prevailed in case concerning Article III standing limitations on ERISA lawsuits.
  • Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Christian
    (U.S. S. Ct.) Defeated claim that CERCLA precluded state-law tort claims for property damage.
  • AFMS v. United Parcel Service and FedEx
    (9th Cir.) Prevailed in significant antitrust case, defeating claims against client UPS.
  • Lower Elwha Klallam Indian Tribe v. Lummi Nation
    (9th Cir.) Won reversal for the Lummi Nation, reclaiming its historic treaty rights.
  • Bank v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
    (2d Cir.) Obtained dismissal of a Telephone Consumer Protection Act suit on the ground that the call was political speech.
  • Flores v. UPS & Pocino Foods v. UPS (Consolidated)
    (9th Cir.) Secured judgment for UPS on two putative RICO and breach-of-contract class actions about its Next Day Air services.
  • Pivotal Software Inc. v. Superior Court of California 
    (U.S. S. Ct.) Secured certiorari for Pivotal Software (part of VMware) on question whether federal law requires stay of discovery in federal securities law actions in state court until the complaint survives a motion to dismiss.
  • In re: SSA Bonds Antitrust Litigation 
    (2d Cir.) Defended dismissal in appeal raising issues of antitrust law and personal jurisdiction.
Show More


Close
Feedback

Disclaimer

Unsolicited e-mails and information sent to Morrison & Foerster will not be considered confidential, may be disclosed to others pursuant to our Privacy Policy, may not receive a response, and do not create an attorney-client relationship with Morrison & Foerster. If you are not already a client of Morrison & Foerster, do not include any confidential information in this message. Also, please note that our attorneys do not seek to practice law in any jurisdiction in which they are not properly authorized to do so.