Joel C. Haims

Joel C. Haims


Baruch College (B.B.A., 1990)
Cornell Law School (J.D., 1993)

Bar Admissions

New York

Joel Haims, co-chair of the firm’s global Securities Litigation, Enforcement, and White-Collar Defense Group, focuses his practice on securities litigation, including class actions, shareholder derivative cases and corporate control litigation, as well as SEC enforcement proceedings and corporate internal investigations. He also has substantial experience litigating complex commercial cases, including real estate disputes and contested bankruptcy proceedings.

Mr. Haims regularly represents public companies, their officers, directors and board committees in cases before trial and appellate courts throughout the country, and in mediation to facilitate settlement. He defends clients across a diverse range of industries, including financial services, real estate, life sciences, technology and consumer products, and has extensive experience advising foreign-based companies, particularly in China, Japan, Israel, Canada, and Bermuda, in connection with securities and compliance issues related to their cross-border and U.S. operations.

Working closely with the firm’s Business & Finance Department lawyers, Mr. Haims also advises clients on a variety of corporate and securities transactions. For example, he works closely with the firm’s Real Estate Group advising banks and commercial real estate developers on the securities law aspects of real estate financing transactions involving the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Pilot Program.

In addition, Mr. Haims has extensive experience litigating religious rights cases, particularly under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA). He served as lead trial counsel for the Westchester Day School in its landmark litigation against the Village of Mamaroneck and its Zoning Board of Appeals under RLUIPA, and he successfully defended the USTA in a religious discrimination lawsuit.

A frequent author and lecturer on topics involving securities litigation as well as arbitration and mediation, Mr. Haims is recognized as a thought leader in his field.

Mr. Haims currently serves as Chair and President of MATI USA – The Jerusalem Business Development Center, Inc. MATI USA supports the work of MATI Jerusalem in stimulating the economy of the city by boosting job and new business creation, and eradicating poverty and joblessness through encouraging and facilitating entrepreneurship. MATI, a not-for-profit NGO, has a successful track record of accomplishments through training courses, one-on-one mentoring and help in developing business plans and accessing loans. MATI bridges economic and social gaps through special outreach and support services targeted to people from all walks of life in the city of Jerusalem.

Representative Matters

Securities Class Actions/Individual Cases

  • Won dismissal of all claims against Etsy, Inc. in a class action on behalf of 300 issuers and over 1,000 individual defendants in the “IPO Allocation” securities class actions – perhaps the largest collection of securities class actions ever brought. The federal court granted our motion with prejudice and terminated the action.
  • Represented public companies and their officers and directors in shareholder class actions in federal and state courts throughout the country, including Cirrus Logic, Blackberry, Etsy, Nortel, Argus Group, ATC Healthcare, Pharmos Corp., Qiao Xing, and LJ International.
  • Represented former Bear Stearns mortgage department employees in civil securities cases and regulatory matters relating to Bear Stearns’ residential mortgage-backed securities business.
  • Represented ResCap LLC in connection with the successful settlement of billions of dollars of residential mortgage backed securities claims (and more than two dozen securities cases) as part of ResCap’s bankruptcy proceedings.
  • Represented Hong Kong affiliate of a Big Four auditor in defense of claims arising out of a bond offering by a Canadian public company.
  • Won dismissal of all claims against an investment firm and its two principals in securities litigation arising from a complex multimillion dollar PIPE transaction involving equity and interest rate swaps.
  • Represented Chinese individuals in insider trading case brought by the SEC alleging trading in the securities of Nexen Inc. while in possession of nonpublic information about an impending announcement of Nexen’s acquisition by China-based CNOOC Ltd.
  • Won dismissal of all claims against Yahoo! subsidiary Flurry and its CEO in litigation alleging material misstatements and omissions about the value of Flurry’s stock (non-public at the time) prior to its acquisition by Yahoo!

Shareholder Derivative Litigation

  • Represented public companies and their officers and directors in shareholder derivative cases in federal and state courts throughout the country, including Yahoo!, Capital One, Cirrus Logic, Vringo, Eclispys, and LJ International.

M&A Litigation

  • Representing Evercore Group as financial advisor to ExamWorks Group, Inc. in connection with ExamWork’s $2.2 billion acquisition by an affiliate of private equity firm Leonard Green & Partners.
  • Represented Ducera Securities as financial advisor to Monsanto Company in connection with Monsanto’s $66 billion acquisition by Bayer Aktiengesellschaft.
  • Represented Astellas Pharma in connection with its $4 billion acquisition of OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  • Represented Yahoo! in connection with its $270 million acquisition of Interclick, Inc.
  • Represented NTT DATA in connection with its $200 million acquisition of Intelligroup, Inc.
  • Represented SBI Holdings in litigation to compel Acucela, Inc. to hold a special shareholders meeting to vote to replace board members with SBI nominees.

RLUIPA / Religious Rights Cases

  • Served as lead trial counsel and secured a landmark victory in the S.D.N.Y. on behalf of pro bono client Westchester Day School against the Village of Mamaroneck and its Zoning Board of Appeals for violation of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) in its denial of the school’s special permit to expand its facilities. Also successfully argued the appeal in the Second Circuit.
  • Filed amicus brief in Supreme Court of the United States in Holt v. Hobbs, et al. in support of an Arkansas inmate who was denied the ability to grow a half-inch beard in accordance with his Muslim faith.
  • Filed amicus brief in United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in Rich v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. in support of successful kosher diet litigation against the Florida prison system.
  • Successfully defended the United States Tennis Association (USTA) in SDNY litigation relating to the 2014 Eastern Sectional Championships.
  • Representing Jewish inmate in Virginia state prison in RLUIPA litigation in the Western District of Virginia, for failing to provide the prisoner with kosher food and other religious accommodations.

Commercial Cases

  • Represented Bermuda insurance company Argus Group Holdings in litigation with deferred variable annuity policyholder relating to premium account investment loses.
  • Represented Israeli pharmaceutical company in dispute with U.S.-based joint venture partner.
  • Represented Australian sunless tanning company in litigation with U.S. competitor.
  • Represented investment bank in dispute over fees for M&A services.
  • Represented real estate brokerage firm in litigation alleging that it convinced a client to lease more space than it needed for a new N.Y. office based on assurances that it would find subtenants for the excess space and the firm failed to deliver on those assurances.
  • Represented broker dealer in disputes with competitors over poaching allegations.
  • Represented Unilever, Guittard Chocolate, Sun Products, and Inko’s Tea in consumer class actions alleging deceptive sales and marketing practices.

He is recognized by Legal 500 for his work in Securities Litigation and White-Collar Criminal Defense, and is considered a “Future Star” in New York by Benchmark Litigation.

Email Disclaimer

Unsolicited e-mails and information sent to Morrison & Foerster will not be considered confidential, may be disclosed to others pursuant to our Privacy Policy, may not receive a response, and do not create an attorney-client relationship with Morrison & Foerster. If you are not already a client of Morrison & Foerster, do not include any confidential information in this message. Also, please note that our attorneys do not seek to practice law in any jurisdiction in which they are not properly authorized to do so.

©1996-2018 Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved.