Michael Jacob Steel

Michael Jacob Steel

Education

University of California, Davis (B.A., 1977)
University of California, Hastings College of the Law (J.D., 1982)

Bar Admissions

California

Mr. Steel’s practice emphasizes federal, state, and local regulatory compliance issues, crisis management, dispute resolution, and litigation under the Unfair Practices Act, Proposition 65, and other environmental, health, and safety laws. Mr. Steel was recognized as the San Francisco Environmental Lawyer of the Year by Best Lawyers in America 2017, and has repeatedly been named as one of California’s top environmental lawyers by Chambers USA, Legal 500 US, Super Lawyers, and San Francisco Magazine.

Mr. Steel advises industrial companies—including automobile manufacturing, shipbuilding, electronics, communications, plastics, and oil concerns in the areas of hazardous substance handling, air quality, and employee safety. Mr. Steel has also provided compliance counseling to a number of retail, pharmaceutical, biotech, food service, and grocery companies.

Mr. Steel’s practice spans a wide range of environmental disciplines, from land use to hazardous waste management to air pollution control. He was instrumental in shepherding one of the largest industrial projects in the Bay Area through the CEQA process, has obtained and defended land use approvals in the Central Valley, and is currently managing the land use approvals for a $400 million transportation project in Southern California.

He frequently defends multiparty actions alleging misrepresentation of product characteristics, in particular, the failure to disclose the presence of chemicals identified as carcinogens or reproductive toxins. He defended actions alleging that faucets leach lead into drinking water, that calcium dietary supplements contain unsafe levels of lead, and that diesel engines expose people to unsafe levels of exhaust, and that packaged fruit and fruit juices contain lead, among many others.

Mr. Steel also has advised industrial companies on air quality regulatory requirements for more than 30 years, and has worked closely with the California Air Resources Board and California’s local air districts on a wide range of issues from industrial emissions to consumer products to diesel regulation. With the passage of California’s climate legislation, Mr. Steel has continued to work with these regulators and his clients to ensure fair treatment and the smoothest transition to this new regulatory regime as possible.

Mr. Steel has extensive experience assisting clients in cases involving fatal or serious injuries, explosions, chemical releases, fires, and manufacturing, transportation, and construction accidents, as well as allegations of community exposure to toxics. In this capacity, he helps the client to create a coordinated defense strategy from the very beginning of a government investigation or enforcement action, coordinating accident reconstruction and root cause analyses, working with technical experts, managing government interviews and document production, and directing public relations consultants.

Mr. Steel has appeared before the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the Consumer Product Safety Commission, the California Department of Toxic Substances Control, the California Regional Water Quality Control Boards, and state and federal OSHA, as well as the state and federal courts.

Intermodal Container Freight Facility in Los Angeles
Advise Union Pacific Railroad on land use and other environmental permitting matters for $400 million rail facility in Los Angeles. Because of the opposition of some community groups, the project is undergoing a detailed environmental review.
CEQA Challenge to Mining Transportation
Representing a mining company in connection with exhaust emissions from mining equipment and trucks transporting products.
Distribution Center Litigation
Represented the four largest California grocers in case alleging that exposure to diesel exhaust from their delivery trucks causes harm to people in surrounding communities.
TiO2 Joint Defense Group
Defended over 30 companies, including most major cosmetic makers, in a suit alleging that titanium dioxide, which is commonly used as a key ingredient in cosmetics and sunscreens, causes a risk of cancer. Our motion for summary judgment was granted in July 2015. Plaintiff’s expert admitted that he could not specify which TiO2-containing products might result in exposure, and all he could say was that it was more likely than not that some products would require a cancer warning. The court agreed with our argument that such expert opinion does not provide a “credible factual basis” for going to trial. Plaintiff has agreed not to pursue an appeal of the judgment.
Avgas Litigation
Represented a major oil company that had been threatened by a citizen’s group with litigation for allegedly causing the pollution of drinking water sources and air, exposing residents living near 25 airports throughout California to lead from avgas. Persuaded the plaintiff to withdraw its notice of intent to sue.
Retail Hazardous Waste Cases
Defended major retailers in cases alleging that damaged or returned goods such as household cleaners, shampoo, and many other products must be managed as hazardous waste. Resolved cases on terms favorable to clients.
Intermodal Container Freight Facility in Los Angeles
Advise Union Pacific Railroad on land use and other environmental permitting matters for $400 million rail facility in Los Angeles. Because of the opposition of some community groups, the project is undergoing a detailed environmental review.
CEQA Challenge to Mining Transportation
Representing a mining company in connection with exhaust emissions from mining equipment and trucks transporting products.
Distribution Center Litigation
Represented the four largest California grocers in case alleging that exposure to diesel exhaust from their delivery trucks causes harm to people in surrounding communities.
TiO2 Joint Defense Group
Defended over 30 companies, including most major cosmetic makers, in a suit alleging that titanium dioxide, which is commonly used as a key ingredient in cosmetics and sunscreens, causes a risk of cancer. Our motion for summary judgment was granted in July 2015. Plaintiff’s expert admitted that he could not specify which TiO2-containing products might result in exposure, and all he could say was that it was more likely than not that some products would require a cancer warning. The court agreed with our argument that such expert opinion does not provide a “credible factual basis” for going to trial. Plaintiff has agreed not to pursue an appeal of the judgment.
Avgas Litigation
Represented a major oil company that had been threatened by a citizen’s group with litigation for allegedly causing the pollution of drinking water sources and air, exposing residents living near 25 airports throughout California to lead from avgas. Persuaded the plaintiff to withdraw its notice of intent to sue.
Retail Hazardous Waste Cases
Defended major retailers in cases alleging that damaged or returned goods such as household cleaners, shampoo, and many other products must be managed as hazardous waste. Resolved cases on terms favorable to clients.

Michael Steel is recommended as a leading lawyer by Chambers USA (2003–2016), Legal 500 US (2007, 2011, 2013–2016), Best Lawyers In America (2007–2015) and Super Lawyers (2004–2014).

Best Lawyers Lawyer of the Year - Michael Steel


“Market commentators highlight Michael Steel as a ‘very smart, out-of-the-box thinker’”
Chambers USA 2015


Michael Steel “‘provides good, solid advice’ and ‘has enormous business acumen’”
Legal 500 US 2015

Email Disclaimer

Unsolicited e-mails and information sent to Morrison & Foerster will not be considered confidential, may be disclosed to others pursuant to our Privacy Policy, may not receive a response, and do not create an attorney-client relationship with Morrison & Foerster. If you are not already a client of Morrison & Foerster, do not include any confidential information in this message. Also, please note that our attorneys do not seek to practice law in any jurisdiction in which they are not properly authorized to do so.

©1996-2017 Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved.