Antitrust Law | Mergers + Acquisitions


Mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures, and exclusive license transfers can enable companies to reach their strategic goals. Antitrust clearances may affect the transaction's timing and valuation, as well as any bidding process. Promptly obtaining required clearances is often an essential step toward capturing the deal's full value.

The risk of antitrust delay or opposition is greater than ever for global businesses. An increasing number of the more than 90 jurisdictions with antitrust review regimes require pre-closing review. Each jurisdiction's review process has different rules, notification requirements, and timelines. To get the deal done, parties must develop a global strategy to minimize the risk that an antitrust agency will delay or seek to block the deal.

Why MoFo?

We have been trusted for decades by some of the world's most prominent businesses in a range of industries to guide them through the maze of multi-jurisdictional merger review. We work with clients in virtually every industry sector, ranging from computers to cleaning products, phones to pharmaceuticals, and technology to transportation. Our antitrust teams collaborate across continents, representing clients in merger reviews in the United States, Europe, and Asia and coordinating clearance processes across the globe.

What We Do

We work with our clients to understand their business goals and develop deal-specific strategies to clear the antitrust hurdles to achieving those goals.

We work collaboratively as an integrated team to leverage our collective legal, agency, and industry expertise. This holistic approach enables us to:

  • Identify potential antitrust risks before the transaction is negotiated
  • Ensure the proper allocation of antitrust risk between the parties
  • Develop winning arguments and solutions to address any agency concerns

We are focused on achieving our clients' business objectives and getting their deals done as quickly and efficiently as possible.

Expertise

We have a long history of success in obtaining approval for our clients' transactions. The depth of our industry, agency, and legal expertise enables us to pinpoint potential antitrust concerns and develop effective strategies to resolve them.

  • Industry Expertise – We draw on a deep well of industry knowledge to perfect our command of the markets in which our clients compete. This expertise enables us to counter antitrust theories with business reality and devise innovative solutions to agency concerns.
  • Agency Expertise – We have decades of experience appearing before antitrust agencies around the globe. Our team includes former agency officials and staff from the United States, the EU, and Japan. We understand how different jurisdictions operate and the different analytical tools they apply.
  • Legal and Economic Expertise – We have played a leading role in shaping modern antitrust law through litigation and thought leadership. Our lawyers participate as advisors to the enforcers' own International Competition Network, present to groups of enforcement officials on current issues in antitrust law, and take leadership roles in the ABA's Antitrust Section.
  • Trial Expertise – Our lawyers have successfully defended merger cases in court. As trial lawyers, we excel at making the complexities of antitrust analysis accessible to judges and juries.

Strategic Solutions

We partner with our clients to devise global solutions to ensure their transactions are completed in a timely and efficient manner. Antitrust risk varies between buyers and sellers, between transactions, and between jurisdictions. We carefully assess the nature and scope of the risk in each deal, and tailor a solution to fit our client's objectives.

  • Initial Evaluation – We provide clients with an early assessment of the principal antitrust risks that a deal will face.
  • Transaction Negotiation – We provide counsel in the diligence process and work seamlessly with our client, corporate team, and counsel for other parties to allocate risk through deal-specific transaction terms.
  • Agency Review – We closely coordinate the review process worldwide, working proactively with each agency to identify and address any concerns. We utilize leading-edge e-discovery tools to respond to Second Requests quickly and cost-effectively.
  • Agency Approval – We make detailed evidentiary presentations, which are supported by business executives with first-hand knowledge of market realities and sophisticated economic analysis, to persuade agencies to approve our clients' transactions.
  • Guidance – We design procedures to satisfy business needs while avoiding gun-jumping and collusion concerns that can arise from pre-closing due diligence and integration planning that can trigger competition concerns and may create collateral issues for merging parties.
  • Remedies – If necessary, we work closely with our clients to devise remedies to address agency concerns while preserving the benefits of the deal.
  • Litigation – We are always prepared, in the event that an acceptable resolution cannot be reached, to force the agency to take the matter to court, and our lawyers have done just that.

Representative Highlights

Our antitrust lawyers have obtained multi-jurisdictional regulatory clearance for numerous major transactions, including:

  • Softbank’s $1.26 billion control investment in Brightstar
  • Arbitron Inc.’s $1.3 billion acquisition by Nielsen Holdings N.V.
  • Pinnacle Entertainment’s $2.8 billion acquisition of Ameristar Casinos, Inc.
  • Intel Corporation’s $4.1 billion investments in ASML
  • Sourcefire, Inc.’s $2.7B acquisition by Cisco Systems
  • Softbank’s $1.26 billion control investment in Brightstar
  • The €1.6 billion acquisition of Georgia-Pacific’s European tissue operations by Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget SCA AB
  • Sumitomo Corporation in its joint venture with The Japan Steel Works, Ltd. and Gerdau S.A., the largest steelmaker in Brazil, to manufacture and sale of forged parts for wind power generation.
  • The $2.5 billion sale of Elpida to Micron Technology
  • ON Semiconductor Inc.’s  $400 million acquisition of Aptina Imaging
  • Hitachi's $4.8 billion sale of Hitachi GST to Western Digital
  • Yahoo!’s $640 million acquisition of BrightRoll
  • SoftBank’s $21.6 billion acquisition of a 78% stake in Sprint Nextel
  • AirTran Airways' $1.4 billion merger with Southwest Airlines
  • Intel Corporation's $1.4 billion acquisition of Infineon Technologies' Wireless Solutions Business
  • Fujitsu Semiconductor in a $100 million joint venture company with Panasonic and the Development Bank of Japan
  • Arch Coal's $364 million acquisition of Triton (prevailing in court over an FTC merger challenge)
  • Nestlé's $40 billion sale of Alcon stock to Novartis
  • Whirlpool's $2.7 billion acquisition of Maytag

U.S. News – Best Lawyers® Best Law Firms 2017
National: Antitrust Law
National: Litigation - Antitrust
New York: Antitrust Law
New York: Litigation - Antitrust
San Francisco: Litigation - Antitrust
Washington, D.C.: Antitrust Law
Washington, D.C.: Litigation - Antitrust


Chambers Asia-Pacific 2017
Japan: Competition/Antitrust


Chambers Global 2017
USA: Competition/Antitrust


Chambers USA 2017
Nationwide: Antitrust
California: Antitrust
Washington, D.C.: Antitrust


Global Competition Review 2011 (11th edition)
Global 100 directory


Legal 500 Asia-Pacific 2017
Japan: Competition/Antitrust 


Legal 500 Europe, Middle East & Africa 2011
Belgium: EU Competition


Legal 500 US 2017
Mergers, Acquisitions and Buyouts: Antitrust
Antitrust: Cartel
Antitrust: Civil Litigation/Class Actions


PLC Which lawyer? 2010
EU Competition: European Union: Competition/Antitrust
Japan: Competition/Antitrust
United States: California: Los Angeles: Competition/Antitrust
United States: California: San Francisco and Silicon Valley: Competition/Antitrust


PLC Which lawyer? 2009 Global 50 Portrait
Dispute Resolution noted as global area of excellence

“The firm is excellent. They provide the hard advice and manage complex global investigations seamlessly.”
(Chambers USA 2015)


“They know the industry and the business well so that they are able to provide helpful legal advice that reflects the realities of both the company and the industry.”
(Chambers USA 2015)


“Morrison & Foerster LLP has a ‘very good reputation’ in the market.”
(Legal 500 US 2015)


“They're on top of the very technical legal aspects, their way of thinking is very international and they have good business logic.”
(Chambers Asia Pacific 2015)

Email Disclaimer

Unsolicited e-mails and information sent to Morrison & Foerster will not be considered confidential, may be disclosed to others pursuant to our Privacy Policy, may not receive a response, and do not create an attorney-client relationship with Morrison & Foerster. If you are not already a client of Morrison & Foerster, do not include any confidential information in this message. Also, please note that our attorneys do not seek to practice law in any jurisdiction in which they are not properly authorized to do so.

©1996-2017 Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved.