Morrison & Foerster represents clients in federal and state energy regulatory matters, in regulatory litigation, and on major infrastructure and other transactions. We represent and advise clients in connection with legislative and regulatory developments affecting the energy industry, and maintain an active energy regulatory practice in Washington, D.C., representing clients before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), the Department of Energy (DOE), and other federal agencies with energy jurisdiction on a range of matters and issues. We also represent clients before state utility/public service commissions.
We regularly address energy regulatory issues critical to mergers and acquisitions, corporate reorganizations, asset acquisitions and dispositions, and project development and financing. We advise developers, financial institutions, investors, and commodity marketers on energy regulatory issues associated with electric generating projects, independent electric transmission facilities, natural gas pipeline and storage projects, natural gas liquefaction terminals and natural gas export opportunities, hydroelectric generating projects, and utility companies. We advise non-U.S. governmental agencies and other non-U.S. clients on energy regulatory and transactional issues, including export authorization and regulation; competitive electricity markets for products (such as energy, capacity, and ancillary services); coordination of natural gas and electricity markets and policies; unbundling and restructuring of the supply, transportation, and distribution of natural gas; and restructuring of the electric utility industry.
Energy Regulation Affecting Transactions
We assist clients in identifying and resolving energy regulatory issues in connection with investments in power generating projects and portfolios, natural gas pipeline and storage facilities, natural gas liquefaction terminals, cogeneration facilities, renewable fuel projects, and integrated utility companies. We work closely with clients seeking to develop, license, construct, and operate conventional, alternative, and renewable energy, LNG, and gas pipeline projects, and to authorize, expand, or restructure generation, transmission, and distribution facilities. We regularly represent parties in a wide variety of merchant energy and commodity transactions. We provide strategic counseling for clients with interests in the gas, electric, and oil pipeline businesses on a range of matters, including renewable energy portfolio standards, resource adequacy, generation and transmission project siting and development, distributed generation, retail power sales, generator interconnection procedures and contracts, transmission rates and terms of service, smart grid, demand response, energy efficiency, and energy storage rules and policies.
We have successfully litigated some of the energy sector's most important cases. Our attorneys have litigated many jurisdictional disputes involving the Federal Power Act and the Natural Gas Act. Our recent representations include trial victories in two federal courts successfully challenging the constitutionality of certain state energy procurement mandates (PPL EnergyPlus v. Nazarian (D. Md. 2013) and PPL EnergyPlus v. Solomon (D. N.J. 2013)) on grounds of federal preemption. We appear before regulators, as well as federal and state trial and appellate courts, in a wide range of contested matters and multiparty settlement proceedings, including electric, natural gas, and oil pipeline rate cases; state and federal court challenges to energy projects; controversies regarding state implementation of PURPA; appeals of state public utility commission and FERC decisions; antitrust claims concerning electric and natural gas industry companies; complex contract disputes; disputes between energy service providers and suppliers, and utilities or commercial/industrial customers; controversies concerning interconnection and transmission access; and disputes as to pipeline service obligations. We regularly represent clients in FERC and other investigations and in securities cases arising out of major energy industry events, such as the California energy crisis. We represent AES Corporation with respect to the FERC investigations of all wholesale sellers of electricity in the spot markets operated by the California Independent System Operator and the California Power Exchange, and in the hearings related to the investigations.
For more than three decades, we have represented the State of Alaska in all of its oil pipeline matters before FERC on the Trans-Alaska Pipeline (TAPS). At both the FERC and the Regulatory Commission of Alaska, the rate litigation and settlements have resulted in more than $7 billion of increased royalties and production tax revenues to the State. We have addressed issues such as quality banks, pumpability factors, remediation costs for corrosion repairs and deficient management practices, and inclusion of settlement costs related to the Exxon Valdez oil spill in FERC hearings, rulemakings, and declaratory order proceedings. We also represented Alaska in North Slope oil and gas royalty litigation, Alaska production tax cases, lease sale litigation, and bankruptcy proceedings.
Energy Project Development & Finance
Our energy, corporate, and project finance attorneys work together to structure U.S. and international renewable energy projects, including assisting with the negotiation of underlying power purchase agreements, construction contracts, operation and maintenance agreements, thermal host agreements, and natural gas and other fuel supply and commodity agreements. Our Clean Technology and Renewable Energy team has extensive experience providing legal services to companies in the renewable energy sector, including those engaged in solar, biofuels, wind, geothermal, ocean (tide and wave energy), waste-to-energy, energy storage, and hydroelectric matters. We served as counsel to many State of Alaska administrations on the development of the Alaska gas pipeline (the world’s largest energy project) in extensive FERC hearings, rulemakings, and declaratory order proceedings. We served as lead counsel to the Liberty Natural Gas project before its reorganization, a $750 billion deepwater port and pipeline to be licensed by the U.S. Maritime Administration and the FERC.
Merchant Energy and Commodities
Our work in the merchant energy field is performed by an interdisciplinary team drawn from our derivatives and commodities, secured finance and project finance, capital markets, tax, energy regulatory, and financial restructuring practices. Our team represents commodity dealers and merchants in energy finance and hedging programs, long-term commodity supply arrangements, storage, tolling, processing and off-take deals, trading collateral documentation, and product structuring and development.
Our Energy Regulatory Clients Include:
AES Corporation, BayWa r.e. Wind, Comverge, EDF Renewable Energy, Fiera Axium Infrastructure, Inc., JP Morgan, Liberty Natural Gas (before reorganization), Pacific Energy Partners, Plains All American Pipeline L.P. (a subsidiary of Pacific Pipeline System LLC), Pristine Sun, PSEG, Southwest Gas Corporation, UBS Infrastructure & Private Equity, UGI Corp., the State of Alaska, and WGL Holdings.
"Morrison & Foerster LLP’s energy team . . . ‘performs excellently’." (Legal 500 US 2011)
"The firm has a terrific DOE practice." (Chambers USA 2011)
"They are making a name for themselves in renewables." (Chambers USA 2012)
"These lawyers are wonderful; we had no corporate knowledge of climate change issues and they educated us. They really know the area and are thorough, practical and fast." (Chambers USA 2011)
©1996-2019 Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved.