2006 Patent Law Highlights

2/21/2007

Intellectual Property Litigation, Interferences, IP Due Diligence, Litigation, and Patent Litigation

San Diego

Seminar

In addition to the Supreme Court’s consideration of whether to reject the Federal Circuit’s “Motivation to Combine” test for obviousness (KSR v. Teleflex), what other patent cases from 2006 will have the most impact in the future?

We will discuss these questions and more:

  • What is the scope of attorney-client privilege waiver once a defendant relies on its opinion of counsel as a defense to willful infringement?
  • Will the Federal Circuit defer to district courts’ Markman rulings?
  • Does a licensee have standing to challenge the validity of a licensed patent even if the licensee has not breached the agreement?
  • Is a patentee automatically entitled to an injunction against an infringer?

Who Should Attend:

Chief Scientific Officers, Directors and Managers of Intellectual Property Departments, and In-house Counsel

There is no charge to attend this seminar.


Email Disclaimer

Unsolicited e-mails and information sent to Morrison & Foerster will not be considered confidential, may be disclosed to others pursuant to our Privacy Policy, may not receive a response, and do not create an attorney-client relationship with Morrison & Foerster. If you are not already a client of Morrison & Foerster, do not include any confidential information in this message. Also, please note that our attorneys do not seek to practice law in any jurisdiction in which they are not properly authorized to do so.

©1996-2017 Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved.