ABA Antitrust Teleconference
In Kimble v. Marvel, the Supreme Court recently reaffirmed its oft-criticized holding in Brulotte v. Thys Co. that charging post-expiration patent royalties is per se misuse. In doing so, the Court distinguished between patent and antitrust precedent, holding that interpretations of the Patent Act enjoy a “superpowered form of stare decisis.” What does Kimble mean for patent licensing? Will it change the lower court tendency to import antitrust principles into the patent misuse doctrine? Will Kimble have spillover effects into other areas of patent law?
Please join the ABA Antitrust Section, Intellectual Property Committee for this teleconference to hear from counsel who argued the case before the Supreme Court as well as color commentary from two leading experts.