In US v. Microsoft, a Decades-Old Law Leaves Few Good Options


01 Mar 2018

Writing in Wired, Morrison & Foerster’s David Newman reviews last week’s much-anticipated oral argument in United States v. Microsoft—which asks whether a warrant issued under 18 U.S.C. § 2703 of the Stored Communications Act (SCA) reaches communications stored overseas by providers located in the United States. Among the takeaways of oral argument was that several justices appeared to see the case as presenting two imperfect outcomes: If the Supreme Court rules in Microsoft’s favor, it could jeopardize the government’s ability to collect information necessary to prosecute serious crimes; a ruling for the government, on the other hand, could render U.S. technology companies less competitive globally and increase the risk that they will be subject to conflicting legal obligations under U.S. law and the laws of foreign jurisdictions where they store data.

Read more in David Newman’ Wired article.




Unsolicited e-mails and information sent to Morrison & Foerster will not be considered confidential, may be disclosed to others pursuant to our Privacy Policy, may not receive a response, and do not create an attorney-client relationship with Morrison & Foerster. If you are not already a client of Morrison & Foerster, do not include any confidential information in this message. Also, please note that our attorneys do not seek to practice law in any jurisdiction in which they are not properly authorized to do so.