Client Alert

Virginia Supreme Court Confirms that the Department’s Interpretation is Entitled to No Weight

22 Mar 2018

The Virginia Supreme Court granted the Company’s petition for rehearing and confirmed that the Department of Revenue’s interpretations that are not contained in regulations are entitled to no weight. 

The Court’s ultimate conclusion in the matter remained the same.  In a 4-3 decision, the Court held that the subject-to-tax safe harbor to the royalty addback was ambiguous and applies only to the extent that the royalties are actually taxed by another state. In addition, the Court agreed with the Company’s alternative argument that a portion of the royalties qualify for the safe harbor when: (1) the royalties are taxed by states that require the royalty payor to add back the royalty payments; or (2) the royalties are taxed by states that require combined or consolidated reporting. Three justices dissented and agreed with the Company that the subject-to-tax safe harbor does not require that the royalties actually be taxed.

Kohl’s Department Stores, Inc. v. Virginia Department of Taxation, Record No. 160681 (Va. Mar. 22, 2018).

Morrison & Foerster LLP was lead counsel in this case and was assisted by Hunton & Williams LLP.

Read a copy of the decision.




Unsolicited e-mails and information sent to Morrison & Foerster will not be considered confidential, may be disclosed to others pursuant to our Privacy Policy, may not receive a response, and do not create an attorney-client relationship with Morrison & Foerster. If you are not already a client of Morrison & Foerster, do not include any confidential information in this message. Also, please note that our attorneys do not seek to practice law in any jurisdiction in which they are not properly authorized to do so.