Calif. Prop 65 Proposals Are Bad Policy


29 Oct 2018
Reprinted with permission

Robert L. Falk, Michael Jacob Steel, and Robin Stafford explain the negative impact that the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment’s proposed rule-making package would have on food companies’ ability to use a key established affirmative defense under Prop 65 in their Law360 article “Calif. Prop 65 Proposals Are Bad Policy.” 

“OEHHA’s currently proposed rule-making continues the agency’s attack on the scientific principles that were relied on by the experts and courts in Beech-Nut, attributing the court of appeal’s “incorrect conclusion” to a purported “lack of clarity” in the existing regulations. The agency’s current proposals represent significant change to long-standing regulations that have stood the test of time and been relied upon by industry for both compliance and defense purposes.”



Unsolicited e-mails and information sent to Morrison & Foerster will not be considered confidential, may be disclosed to others pursuant to our Privacy Policy, may not receive a response, and do not create an attorney-client relationship with Morrison & Foerster. If you are not already a client of Morrison & Foerster, do not include any confidential information in this message. Also, please note that our attorneys do not seek to practice law in any jurisdiction in which they are not properly authorized to do so.