Dealing with the Aftermath

Intellectual Property Magazine

30 Apr 2021

Alex Yap and Jean Nguyen authored an article for Intellectual Property Magazine discussing the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB) decision in Apple Inc v. Fintiv, Inc, clarifying its approach to whether to deny institution of a post-grant proceeding under 35 USC section 314 based on a co-pending district court proceeding.

“The March 2020 Fintiv order was controversial and provoked a spirited response from stakeholders,” the authors wrote. “This included a federal lawsuit in August 2020 by several of Silicon Valley’s heavy hitters, who alleged that the so-called ‘NHK-Fintiv rule’ is ‘procedurally invalid.’ The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office requested comments on the NHK-Fintiv rule and designated two NHK-Fintiv related decisions precedential.”

Read the full article.



Unsolicited e-mails and information sent to Morrison & Foerster will not be considered confidential, may be disclosed to others pursuant to our Privacy Policy, may not receive a response, and do not create an attorney-client relationship with Morrison & Foerster. If you are not already a client of Morrison & Foerster, do not include any confidential information in this message. Also, please note that our attorneys do not seek to practice law in any jurisdiction in which they are not properly authorized to do so.