Can Public Relations Be Private? The Attorney-Client Privilege and Communications with Public Relations Firms

Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Report

20 Dec 2021

Carl Loewenson authored an article for Pratt’s Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Report, explaining that although broad claims of attorney-client privilege for communications with public relations companies have not been successful, limited claims of work product privilege have been accepted.

“Attorneys representing a company that has suffered a data breach or ransomware attack…find themselves handling problems that are often not confined to legal risks,” the authors wrote. “Faced with sudden and unwelcome media interest, companies without a robust in-house public relations group will for many good reasons want to retain a public relations firm. While there is a body of literature in public relations and academic circles arguing that public relations may have become an integral part of the lawyer’s role in high-profile matters, the work an attorney does in pursuit of the role may not be covered by the attorney-client privilege. If a lawyer believes that hiring a public relations firm or consultant would further the client’s litigation interests, the lawyer should not assume those communications will be covered by attorney-client privilege or work product protection.”

Read the full article.



Unsolicited e-mails and information sent to Morrison & Foerster will not be considered confidential, may be disclosed to others pursuant to our Privacy Policy, may not receive a response, and do not create an attorney-client relationship with Morrison & Foerster. If you are not already a client of Morrison & Foerster, do not include any confidential information in this message. Also, please note that our attorneys do not seek to practice law in any jurisdiction in which they are not properly authorized to do so.