In The News

Does it Matter How Investors Fund Their Commitments?


28 Aug 2019

In the PERE article “Does it matter how investors fund their commitments?”, Morrison & Foerster’s Jason Nelms, corporate partner advising on fund formation, and Yemi Tepe, partner in the finance and projects group were quoted on how institutional investors (LPs) are using financing to leverage their balance sheet, and whether funds will have visibility on the underlying source of capital contributions.

The California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) recent consideration of the employment of leverage in its portfolio to capitalise on market opportunities has cast a spotlight on the risks and merits in institutional investors taking on systematic borrowing. The question from a fund’s perspective is then on the considerations required in the acceptance of capital contributions. “How they (investors) fund their capital contributions is totally up to them and the fund will not necessarily have any visibility on the underlying source of capital contributions.” said Yemi. Jason added, “Funds are typically comfortable that, if they have a creditworthy investor that has been funding its capital contributions, they are protected against the risk of future defaults.”

Subscription Required. 



Unsolicited e-mails and information sent to Morrison & Foerster will not be considered confidential, may be disclosed to others pursuant to our Privacy Policy, may not receive a response, and do not create an attorney-client relationship with Morrison & Foerster. If you are not already a client of Morrison & Foerster, do not include any confidential information in this message. Also, please note that our attorneys do not seek to practice law in any jurisdiction in which they are not properly authorized to do so.