Press Release

Morrison & Foerster Wins Summary Judgment for Honeywell in U.S. Military Helicopter Crash Case


SAN FRANCISCO (January 29, 2010) – Morrison & Foerster secured a long-awaited victory for Honeywell International Inc. in a case that arose from the crash of a United States Army Special Operations Aviation Regiment (“SOAR”) helicopter in Afghanistan in February 2007. Judge Claudia Wilken of the U.S. District Court for Northern California granted Honeywell’s motion for summary judgment based on the Government Contractor Defense.

Twenty-two U.S. military personnel were aboard the SOAR MH-47E Chinook helicopter when it crashed in the Zabul Province of Afghanistan upon returning from a night mission to capture or kill a “High Value Target” of Al Qaeda. Eight passengers were killed and the rest sustained injuries in the crash when the helicopter went down after one of its engines failed in severe icing conditions. The survivors and heirs of those killed alleged that the Honeywell-manufactured engines used for the Chinook helicopters were defective, and the plaintiffs sought monetary damages for wrongful death, bodily injuries, and several product liability issues.

In November 2009 Honeywell filed for summary judgment based on the Government Contractor Defense, a defense first recognized by the United States Supreme Court in Boyle v. United Technologies, which extended governmental immunity to contractors of military equipment if built according to government specifications.  Oral arguments were presented on December 10, 2009.  In addition to granting Honeywell’s motion, Judge Wilken granted motions for summary judgment for other defendants, The Boeing Company and Goodrich Pump & Engine Control Systems.

Morrison & Foerster’s winning team was led by partners James Huston, Erin Bosman, and William O’Connor, and included associates Joanna Herman, Ellen Adler, and Jennifer Allison.




Unsolicited e-mails and information sent to Morrison & Foerster will not be considered confidential, may be disclosed to others pursuant to our Privacy Policy, may not receive a response, and do not create an attorney-client relationship with Morrison & Foerster. If you are not already a client of Morrison & Foerster, do not include any confidential information in this message. Also, please note that our attorneys do not seek to practice law in any jurisdiction in which they are not properly authorized to do so.