Morrison Foerster is an international law firm with lawyers practicing throughout the United States, Asia, and Europe. Click to discover more.

mofo_share_image.jpg

Morrison Foerster

favicon.ico

favicon-16x16.png

favicon-32x32.png

apple-touch-icon.png

MoFo Favicons

Terms / Notices

Cookies

Privacy Policy

Attorney Advertising

Secure Login

Alumni

  Facebook

MoFo Facebook

  Linkedin

MoFo LinkedIN

Twitter

MoFo Twitter

YouTube

MoFo Youtube

Morrison Foerster - Footer

You have not solved the recaptcha challenge yet or session expired, try again.

Disclaimer

Unsolicited e-mails and information sent to Morrison & Foerster will not be considered confidential, may be disclosed to others pursuant to our <a href="https://www.mofo.com/about/privacy-policy.html">Privacy Policy</a>, may not receive a response, and do not create an attorney-client relationship with Morrison & Foerster. If you are not already a client of Morrison & Foerster, do not include any confidential information in this message. Also, please note that our attorneys do not seek to practice law in any jurisdiction in which they are not properly authorized to do so.

Feedback

mofo-logo-2022.svg

People

Capabilities

Resources

About

Culture

Offices

Careers

Stay Connected

J. Alexander Lawrence, Craig Celniker, Timothy Blakely, Sarah Thomas, Daniel Levison, and Geary Choe authored an article featured on The Ali Advisor analyzing the United States Supreme Court decision to revisit arguments on whether U.S. discovery in international arbitration is covered under Section 1782. This comes after the Circuit courts have become “increasingly divided on whether the definition includes foreign-seated private commercial arbitral tribunals.”



Supreme Court To Revisit Circuit Split over Discovery in Aid of International Arbitration

About Morrison Forester

people-default-header-desktop.jpg

people-default-header-mobile.jpg

Default Meta Data

J. Alexander Lawrence, Craig Celniker, Timothy Blakely, Sarah Thomas, Daniel Levison, and Geary Choe authored an article featured on The Ali Advisor analyzing the United States Supreme Court decision to revisit arguments on whether U.S. discovery in international arbitration is covered under Section 1782. This comes after the Circuit courts have become “increasingly divided on whether the definition includes foreign-seated private commercial arbitral tribunals.”“Because the uncertainty regarding Section 1782 continues to loom large,” the authors wrote, “the Supreme Court now has a second chance to resolve the circuit split on this important issue.”Read the <a target="_blank" href="https://thealiadviser.org/international-commercial-arbitration/supreme-court-to-revisit-circuit-split-over-discovery-in-aid-of-international-arbitration/">full article</a>.

Supreme Court To Revisit Circuit Split over Discovery in Aid of International Arbitration