Morrison Foerster is an international law firm with lawyers practicing throughout the United States, Asia, and Europe. Click to discover more.

mofo_share_image.jpg

Morrison Foerster

favicon.ico

favicon-16x16.png

favicon-32x32.png

apple-touch-icon.png

MoFo Favicons

Terms / Notices

Cookies

Privacy Policy

Attorney Advertising

Secure Login

Alumni

  Facebook

MoFo Facebook

  Linkedin

MoFo LinkedIN

Twitter

MoFo Twitter

YouTube

MoFo Youtube

Morrison Foerster - Footer

You have not solved the recaptcha challenge yet or session expired, try again.

Disclaimer

Unsolicited e-mails and information sent to Morrison & Foerster will not be considered confidential, may be disclosed to others pursuant to our <a href="https://www.mofo.com/about/privacy-policy.html">Privacy Policy</a>, may not receive a response, and do not create an attorney-client relationship with Morrison & Foerster. If you are not already a client of Morrison & Foerster, do not include any confidential information in this message. Also, please note that our attorneys do not seek to practice law in any jurisdiction in which they are not properly authorized to do so.

Feedback

mofo-logo-2022.svg

People

Capabilities

Resources

About

Culture

Offices

Careers

Stay Connected

Lawyers for the U.S. government and challengers to the federal contractor vaccine mandate both faced tough questions from an Eleventh Circuit panel in Atlanta, Georgia on Friday, April 8, 2022. The appeal from the Southern District of Georgia’s decision preliminarily enjoining Executive Order 14042 late last year primarily raises questions about the President’s authority under the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act (often referred to as the Procurement Act), whether plaintiffs had established the requirements for preliminary injunctive relief, and whether the nationwide preliminary injunction issued by the district court was overbroad. Argument lasted nearly an hour, with Judges Britt C. Grant, J.L. Edmondson, and R. Lanier Anderson III giving each side 25 minutes to both present their case and answer the appellate court’s questions.

Eleventh Circuit Hears Oral Argument in EO 14042 Preliminary Injunction Appeal

About Morrison Forester

people-default-header-desktop.jpg

people-default-header-mobile.jpg

Default Meta Data

Lawyers for the U.S. government and challengers to the federal contractor vaccine mandate both faced tough questions from an Eleventh Circuit panel in Atlanta, Georgia on Friday, April 8, 2022. The appeal from the Southern District of Georgia’s decision preliminarily enjoining Executive Order 14042 late last year primarily raises questions about the President’s authority under the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act (often referred to as the Procurement Act), whether plaintiffs had established the requirements for preliminary injunctive relief, and whether the nationwide preliminary injunction issued by the district court was overbroad. Argument lasted nearly an hour, with Judges Britt C. Grant, J.L. Edmondson, and R. Lanier Anderson III giving each side 25 minutes to both present their case and answer the appellate court’s questions.Read the <a href="https://govcon.mofo.com/federal-procurement/eleventh-circuit-hears-oral-argument-in-eo-14042-preliminary-injunction-appeal/" target="_blank">full blog post</a>.

Eleventh Circuit Hears Oral Argument in EO 14042 Preliminary Injunction Appeal