The Jurisdictional Rope He Handed Them: Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties

In Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties, 608 U.S. ___, 2026 WL 1336216 (U.S. May 14, 2026), the Supreme Court resolved a circuit split that had arisen under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. In a brief opinion, the Court unanimously held that if a federal court has stayed claims in a pending action under the FAA, it maintains jurisdiction to later confirm or vacate any resulting arbitral award. While the opinion is straightforward, the underlying facts reflect a quiet irony that shows how a plaintiff’s initial strategy can potentially backfire. 

Read the full blog post.