Federal courts of appeals often confront the question of how much deference to give a district court’s decision on appeal. In the arbitration context, many circuits call for de novo review of a district court’s denial of a motion to compel arbitration. The Seventh Circuit, however, reevaluated its precedent in Moore v. Club Exploria, LLC, 187 F.4th 970 (7th Cir. 2026), and concluded that recent Supreme Court caselaw requires a more nuanced approach: de novo review is appropriate only if the appellate court determines that the specific question at issue “involves legal principles that will impact future cases.” Otherwise, review is for clear error alone.
Read the full blog post.