Morrison Foerster is an international law firm with lawyers practicing throughout the United States, Asia, and Europe. Click to discover more.

mofo_share_image.jpg

Morrison Foerster

favicon.ico

favicon-16x16.png

favicon-32x32.png

apple-touch-icon.png

MoFo Favicons

Terms / Notices

Cookies

Privacy Policy

Attorney Advertising

Secure Login

Alumni

  Facebook

MoFo Facebook

  Linkedin

MoFo LinkedIN

Twitter

MoFo Twitter

YouTube

MoFo Youtube

Morrison Foerster - Footer

You have not solved the recaptcha challenge yet or session expired, try again.

Disclaimer

Unsolicited e-mails and information sent to Morrison & Foerster will not be considered confidential, may be disclosed to others pursuant to our <a href="https://www.mofo.com/about/privacy-policy.html">Privacy Policy</a>, may not receive a response, and do not create an attorney-client relationship with Morrison & Foerster. If you are not already a client of Morrison & Foerster, do not include any confidential information in this message. Also, please note that our attorneys do not seek to practice law in any jurisdiction in which they are not properly authorized to do so.

Feedback

mofo-logo-2022.svg

People

Capabilities

Resources

About

Culture

Offices

Careers

Stay Connected

David Cross was featured in MLex Market Insight’s coverage of Teradata Corp. v. SAP SE, in which Teradata accused rival SAP SE of using an illegal tying scheme to cement its dominance in enterprise systems.

Teradata Tells U.S. Judge Economic Power Over Tied Product Sufficient Proof of Anticompetitive Harm

About Morrison Forester

people-default-header-desktop.jpg

people-default-header-mobile.jpg

Default Meta Data

David Cross was featured in MLex Market Insight’s coverage of Teradata Corp. v. SAP SE, in which Teradata accused rival SAP SE of using an illegal tying scheme to cement its dominance in enterprise systems.Acting for Teradata, David told U.S. District Judge William H. Orrick of the Northern District of California that there is “no dispute” in the case that SAP is forcing its customers to buy its HANA software even though customers don’t want it.“We don’t even actually have to show market dominance,” David said during a hearing on a motion for summary judgment. “We just have to show economic power over a tying product can be sufficient” to prove harm to competition.SAP has sufficient market power to force customers to buy HANA, he argued. “If customers are forced to buy the tied product, that’s not only evidence of market power in the tied market, but it’s evidence of harm to competition in the tied market.”Read the <a target="_blank" href="https://content.mlex.com/#/content/1329075">full article</a> (subscription required).

Teradata Tells U.S. Judge Economic Power Over Tied Product Sufficient Proof of Anticompetitive Harm

Sign Up

David D. Cross

Partner

Antitrust Law