Morrison Foerster is an international law firm with lawyers practicing throughout the United States, Asia, and Europe. Click to discover more.

mofo_share_image.jpg

Morrison Foerster

favicon.ico

favicon-16x16.png

favicon-32x32.png

apple-touch-icon.png

MoFo Favicons

Terms / Notices

Cookies

Privacy Policy

Attorney Advertising

Secure Login

Alumni

  Facebook

MoFo Facebook

  Linkedin

MoFo LinkedIN

Twitter

MoFo Twitter

YouTube

MoFo Youtube

Morrison Foerster - Footer

You have not solved the recaptcha challenge yet or session expired, try again.

Disclaimer

Unsolicited e-mails and information sent to Morrison Foerster will not be considered confidential, may be disclosed to others pursuant to our <a href="https://www.mofo.com/about/privacy-policy.html">Privacy Policy</a>, may not receive a response, and do not create an attorney-client relationship with Morrison Foerster. If you are not already a client of Morrison Foerster, do not include any confidential information in this message. Also, please note that our attorneys do not seek to practice law in any jurisdiction in which they are not properly authorized to do so.

Feedback

mofo-logo-2022.svg

People

Capabilities

Resources

About

Culture

Offices

Careers

Stay Connected

Lisa Phelan spoke to Global Competition Review about the not-guilty verdict in the Department of Justice’s criminal wage-fixing case against Neeraj Jindal, the former owner of a therapist staffing company, and John Rodgers, a clinical director at the company.



Jindal Gives First Look Into Jury Views on Labor Market Cases

About Morrison Forester

people-default-header-desktop.jpg

people-default-header-mobile.jpg

Default Meta Data

Lisa Phelan spoke to Global Competition Review about the not-guilty verdict in the Department of Justice’s criminal wage-fixing case against Neeraj Jindal, the former owner of a therapist staffing company, and John Rodgers, a clinical director at the company.According to Lisa, there was “fairly compelling documentary evidence” that seemed to demonstrate there was an illegal agreement to fix employees’ wages, so the verdict has now “got to give [the DOJ] pause” to consider whether it was “a factually insufficient case or if jurors do not like these types of cases.”Read the <a target="_blank" href="https://globalcompetitionreview.com/gcr-usa/department-of-justice/jindal-gives-first-look-jury-views-labour-market-cases?utm_source=Jindal%2Bgives%2Bfirst%2Blook%2Binto%2Bjury%2Bviews%2Bon%2Blabour%2Bmarket%2Bcases&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=GCR%2BUSA%2BBriefing">full article</a>.