Morrison Foerster is an international law firm with lawyers practicing throughout the United States, Asia, and Europe. Click to discover more.

mofo_share_image.jpg

Morrison Foerster

favicon.ico

favicon-16x16.png

favicon-32x32.png

apple-touch-icon.png

MoFo Favicons

Terms / Notices

Cookies

Privacy Policy

Attorney Advertising

Secure Login

Alumni

  Facebook

MoFo Facebook

  Linkedin

MoFo LinkedIN

Twitter

MoFo Twitter

YouTube

MoFo Youtube

Morrison Foerster - Footer

You have not solved the recaptcha challenge yet or session expired, try again.

Disclaimer

Unsolicited e-mails and information sent to Morrison Foerster will not be considered confidential, may be disclosed to others pursuant to our <a href="https://www.mofo.com/about/privacy-policy.html">Privacy Policy</a>, may not receive a response, and do not create an attorney-client relationship with Morrison Foerster. If you are not already a client of Morrison Foerster, do not include any confidential information in this message. Also, please note that our attorneys do not seek to practice law in any jurisdiction in which they are not properly authorized to do so.

Feedback

mofo-logo-2022.svg

People

Capabilities

Resources

About

Culture

Offices

Careers

Stay Connected

Lisa Phelan spoke to Bloomberg Law about the Department of Justice (DOJ) launching its third attempt at convincing a jury that some chicken manufacturing executives violated federal antitrust law by colluding to fix prices.



Chicken Industry Execs Face DOJ’s Third Trial Over Price-Fixing

About Morrison Forester

people-default-header-desktop.jpg

people-default-header-mobile.jpg

Default Meta Data

Lisa Phelan spoke to Bloomberg Law about the Department of Justice (DOJ) launching its third attempt at convincing a jury that some chicken manufacturing executives violated federal antitrust law by colluding to fix prices.According to Lisa, in this latest attempt, the DOJ will likely simplify the case, as evidenced by its decision to cut the number of defendants to five.The prosecutors will be best served by trying to explain the relationship between allegations and impact, like demonstrating for jurors that the defendants’ conduct may have contributed to consumers paying more for a meal at Wendy’s, Lisa said. “Simplifying down and clearly connecting the dots is the best path to a clear conviction in an antitrust case,” she said.Read the <a target="_blank" href="https://www.bloomberglaw.com/bloomberglawnews/antitrust/XE4IC65K000000?bna_news_filter=antitrust#jcite">full article</a> (subscription required).