Damien Specht spoke to Bloomberg Law about a Lockheed Martin unit asking an appeals court to reinstate claims that the $2 billion the U.S. Air Force agreed to pay under F-16 fighter jet contracts wasn’t enough.
This appeal is “another case highlighting the problems caused by the lack of a clear and universally agreed-upon definition of when a government action – or contractor request – is a claim for CDA [Contract Disputes Act] purposes,” Damien said.
He added that unilateral definitizations at prices the contractor never contemplated are an inherent risk, and one reason contractors try to avoid them.
Read the full article (subscription may be required).