Kim Hamm spoke to the Wall Street Journal about the House Oversight Committee's contempt findings against Bill and Hillary Clinton for declining to appear for depositions regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The article details bipartisan support for the contempt votes and the Clintons' arguments that the subpoenas lack legitimate legislative purpose. Kim commented on the unpredictability of a potential contempt prosecution, stating, “The House could get a bad ruling, a ruling that sort of agrees with the Clintons. It is also very possible it could be a very positive ruling.” The piece also reviews the broader context of congressional investigations into Epstein and related figures.
Read the full article.