Morrison Foerster is an international law firm with lawyers practicing throughout the United States, Asia, and Europe. Click to discover more.

Morrison Foerster

common-default.jpeg

Terms / Notices

Cookies

Privacy Policy

Reporting Hotline

Attorney Advertising

Alumni

  Linkedin

MoFo LinkedIN

  Facebook

MoFo Facebook

YouTube

MoFo Youtube

Morrison Foerster - Footer

State Foreign Agent Laws

You have not solved the recaptcha challenge yet or session expired, try again.

Email Disclaimer

Disclaimer

Unsolicited e-mails and information sent to Morrison Foerster will not be considered confidential, may be disclosed to others pursuant to our <a href="https://www.mofo.com/about/privacy-policy.html">Privacy Policy</a>, may not receive a response, and do not create an attorney-client relationship with Morrison Foerster. If you are not already a client of Morrison Foerster, do not include any confidential information in this message. Also, please note that our attorneys do not seek to practice law in any jurisdiction in which they are not properly authorized to do so.

Feedback

mofo-logo-2022.svg

People

Capabilities

Resources

About

Community

Offices

Careers

Stay Connected

In the last year, five states—Arkansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, and Texas—have enacted their own versions of FARA. Similar...

<h3>Sorry, we weren’t able to find the terms you entered.</h3>Please try a different term or keyword.

People

Capabilities

Resources

Not Found Cards

Key Contact<table><tbody><tr><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

In the last year, five states—Arkansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, and Texas—have enacted their own versions of FARA. Similar legislation has been proposed in several others. And though efforts to pass FARA-like laws in some states began well before the current administration, many now appear more eager to pick up the mantle. Many of the so-called “baby FARA” laws adopted by state governments mirror the core structure of their federal analogue: persons who attempt to influence state politics on behalf of a foreign entity, especially a foreign government, must register and make certain disclosures. But the state laws often depart from the federal statute in ways that illuminate the states’ unique concerns. Six states have currently enacted their own version of FARA; two states have also enacted similar laws related to campaign expenditures: <div><span class="rich-text-component-embed" data-component-info="{&quot;uid&quot;:&quot;bltec365b5ea2957ec0&quot;,&quot;locale&quot;:&quot;en-us&quot;,&quot;_version&quot;:5,&quot;border_variant&quot;:&quot;black&quot;,&quot;header_variant&quot;:&quot;blue&quot;,&quot;table_source&quot;:&quot;&lt;table&gt;&lt;thead&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;th&gt;&lt;p style=\&quot;text-align: center;\&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;State&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/th&gt;&lt;th&gt;&lt;p style=\&quot;text-align: center;\&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Covered Activities&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/th&gt;&lt;th&gt;&lt;p style=\&quot;text-align: center;\&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Foreign Principals&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/th&gt;&lt;th&gt;&lt;p style=\&quot;text-align: center;\&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Exemptions&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/th&gt;&lt;th&gt;&lt;p style=\&quot;text-align: center;\&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Penalties&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/th&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/thead&gt;&lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Arkansas&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=\&quot;https://arkleg.state.ar.us/Bills/Detail?id=HB1800&amp;amp;ddBienniumSession=2025%2F2025R\&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;House Bill 1800/Act 998&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(Registration required by Jan. 31, 2026)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;Representatives of a hostile foreign principal engaging in political activity, defined as activities “performed to influence an agency or public official of this state” in regard to laws or elections, must register with the Secretary of State. Additionally, a foreign-supported political organization that engages in political activity must register. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;Governments of and other entities related to China, Russia, North Korea, and Iran. A foreign-supported political organization is defined as a political party or entity that has, within the past five calendar years, received something of value from a hostile foreign principal or a representative of a hostile foreign principal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;None.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;$500 dollar fine per violation; for willful or repeated violations, up to $2,000 fine per violation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Florida&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=\&quot;https://laws.flrules.org/2025/22\&quot;&gt;Senate Bill 700&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(Effective July 1, 2025)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;Charities, other non-profits, and professional fundraisers are prohibited from receiving or soliciting anything of value from a foreign “country of concern” or individuals associated with those countries.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, the Maduro Regime in Venezuela, and Syria, plus entities under significant control of one of these countries.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;None. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;Willful and knowing violations may be subject to criminal penalties, and civil penalties may be imposed under the state’s deceptive practices statute. A safe harbor provision may prevent penalties for first-time violators if certain remedies are carried out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Louisiana&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=\&quot;https://www.legis.la.gov/legis/BillInfo.aspx?i=249128\&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;House Bill 686&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(Effective Dec. 1, 2025)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;Any person who lobbies Louisiana’s legislative branch on behalf of a foreign adversary government, a corporation or entity whose headquarters or principal place of business is located in one of those countries, or a sanctioned party must register with Louisiana’s Board of Ethics. Registered executive-branch and local-level lobbyists for foreign adversary governments (but not for corporations or entities in those countries) must also register.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;A foreign adversary government is defined based on the “Securing the ICTS Supply Chain” legislation, currently China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, and the Maduro Regime in Venezuela.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;The law excludes registration for lobbying on behalf of entities that are the “subject of, or covered by, a qualified divestiture pursuant to the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act,” and for entities that are registered in the U.S. government’s federal procurement system.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;None specified. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Maine&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=\&quot;https://legislature.maine.gov/statutes/21-a/title21-Asec1064.html\&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Title 21-A §&amp;nbsp;1015&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Enjoined. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;Foreign government-influenced entities are prohibited from contributing funds to influence elections or referendums. Mandatory disclosures are must be included in any public communications that are funded by foreign government-influenced entities to influence the public or any state, county or local official or agency regarding state or local government policy or government relations with a foreign country.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;NOTE: Law currently enjoined by court order. &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;A&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;foreign government-influence entity is defined as:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Foreign governments. &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;An entity in which a foreign government holds, owns, controls, or otherwise has direct or indirect beneficial ownership of 5% or more of the total equity or other ownership interests; &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;An entity that a foreign government directs, dictates, controls, or directly or indirectly participates in the decision-making process with regard to the activities of the entity.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;None.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;Violators can face a penalty not exceeding $5,000 or double the amount of the contribution, expenditure, electioneering communication, donation, or disbursement involved in the violation, whichever is greater.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Nebraska&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=\&quot;https://nebraskalegislature.gov/bills/view_bill.php?DocumentID=58765#:~:text=LB644%20%2D%20Adopt%20the%20Foreign%20Adversary,of%20the%20Foreign%20Adversary%20Contracting\&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Legislative Bill 644&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(Effective October 1, 2025)&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;Agents who: (1) engage in political activity in the interest of the foreign principal; (2) act as a publicity agent or political consultant in the interest of the foreign principal; (3) solicit, collect, or dispense a contribution, money, or other things of value for or in the interest of the foreign principal; (4) or represent the interest of the foreign principal before a state or local agency or official in Nebraska must register.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Political activity is defined as engaging in activity with the belief or intent to influence a state agency or official or political subdivision in the state related to formulating, adopting, or changing policies of the U.S. or Nebraska.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This legislation applies retroactively, with any agent who engaged in covered activity on or after January 1, 2020 required to comply with the requirements of the Act (i.e., register), even if no longer acting as an agent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;Foreign principal is defined based on the “Securing the ICTS Supply Chain” legislation. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Currently includes &lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Governments of &lt;strong&gt;China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, and the Maduro Regime in Venezuela.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Companies organized or headquartered those nations. &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Entities in which those companies have 20% or greater beneficial ownership. &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Designated foreign terrorist organizations&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Exemptions are provided&lt;/strong&gt; for: &lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Diplomats and certain foreign government officials. &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;News services organized or subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S., publications that have filed a Statement of Ownership with the USPS and are owned at least 80% by citizens of the U.S. and not by agents of a foreign principal, and legal representatives.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;Civil penalties of up to $50,000 for willful violations are possible. Violators also face possible expulsion or dismissal if they are affiliated with a Nebraska postsecondary educational institution. The Nebraska Attorney General is authorized to take enforcement actions including injunctions or corrective orders.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Oklahoma &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=\&quot;https://www.oklegislature.gov/BillInfo.aspx?Bill=hb2762&amp;amp;Session=2500\&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;House Bill 2762&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;(&lt;/strong&gt;Effective November 1, 2025)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;Individuals attempting to influence state laws or the award of state funds on behalf of international corporations must register with the Oklahoma Secretary of State’s Office if they receive compensation for their services.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;International corporations mean corporations or business entities incorporated or headquartered outside of the U.S.; or companies owned 51% or more by a foreign entity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;Certain arrangements covered by provisions of a national security agreement with the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;None specified.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Texas &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=\&quot;https://capitol.texas.gov/billlookup/History.aspx?LegSess=89R&amp;amp;Bill=HB119\&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;House Bill 119&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(Effective September 1, 2025)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anyone who communicates directly with members of the Texas legislative or executive branch to influence legislation or administration action on behalf of a foreign adversary, foreign adversary client, or foreign adversary political party must register with the state Ethics Commission. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The law also prohibits receiving compensation for lobbying on behalf of the entities covered under this statute.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;Foreign adversary is defined based on the “Securing the ICTS Supply Chain” legislation, currently China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, and the Maduro Regime in Venezuela. The definition includes an entity under the control of one of these countries and any company or subsidiary that has its principal place of business in one of those countries. A foreign adversary client is defined as a current or former official of a foreign adversary or an entity formed to benefit such a person, as well as the immediate family member of such a person.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;None. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;Violators may be subject to a civil penalty for failing to register or receiving compensation not to exceed an amount equal to three times the compensation, reimbursement, or expenditure.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Utah&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=\&quot;https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title36/Chapter11/36-11-S103.5.html\&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Utah Code Section 36-11-103.5&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(Effective May 4, 2022)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anyone engaging in lobbying in Utah as a foreign agent must register with the lieutenant governor.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lobbying means communicating with a public official for the purpose of influencing a legislative action, executive action, local action, or education action.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;A foreign agent is defined as an individual who “engages in lobbying under contract with a[ny] foreign government.” &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;This requirement only attaches to traditional lobbying activities, not the broad scope of activities contemplated by FARA. It also does not include lobbying by duly accredited diplomatic and consular officers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;p&gt;Intentional violations can result in up to a $1,000 penalty for each violation and up to $5,000 or suspension of the person’s lobbying license for one year for each subsequent violation within 24 months.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;State Foreign Agent Laws Table&quot;,&quot;publish_details&quot;:{&quot;time&quot;:&quot;2025-12-18T21:32:54.535Z&quot;,&quot;user&quot;:&quot;blt02c6960575474003&quot;,&quot;environment&quot;:&quot;bltf4674cd9142c5020&quot;,&quot;locale&quot;:&quot;en-us&quot;,&quot;_trace&quot;:&quot;array_node;description;publish_details&quot;,&quot;_key&quot;:&quot;publish_details&quot;},&quot;_fetched&quot;:true,&quot;_content_type_uid&quot;:&quot;table_content&quot;,&quot;_trace&quot;:&quot;array_node;description&quot;,&quot;_key&quot;:&quot;key&quot;}" data-component-type="table_content" data-component-inline="false"></div>

State Foreign Agent Laws

Brandon L. Van Grack helps lead Morrison Foerster’s National Security group and the Crisis Management group. His practice focuses on investigations, criminal defense, and compliance matters involving export controls and sanctions, foreign investment, and cyber incidents. Brandon’s arrival to the firm follows more than a decade of service at the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), where he held multiple senior positions. In those positions, he helped manage the U.S. government’s tools to address perceived national security threats in China and Russia, oversaw every criminal investigation involving sanctions and export controls, and was Chief of DOJ’s Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) Unit.Brandon’s leadership and breadth of national security experience offers clients in the financial services, technology, artificial intelligence, defense, media, and communications sectors unmatched insider enforcement perspective across the entire national security landscape, including sanctions, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), export control, cybersecurity matters, and FARA.<blockquote>“Brandon sees around corners. He tells me where the government is going.” – Chambers USA</blockquote><h4>Investigations & White Collar Defense </h4>At the DOJ, Brandon led and supervised some of the government’s most significant corporate investigations and resolutions across the national security spectrum. As Counsel to the Assistant Attorney General for National Security, and a Trial Attorney in the Counterintelligence & Export Control Section, he worked on the resolution of almost every significant corporate matter pertaining to export control and sanctions violations in the last decade and is one of the few attorneys to have managed the DOJ’s Voluntary Self‑Disclosure Program for export control and sanctions violations. As Chief of the FARA Unit, he directed scores of investigations of companies for acting as unregistered foreign agents. A selection of Brandon’s investigation & white collar defense experience includes:<ul><li>Obtained closure letter from DOJ for Cole Engineering Services, a subsidiary of By Light Professional IT Services LLC, less than six months after federal agents executed a search warrant at the company as part of a DOJ investigation.</li><li>Obtained declination from DOJ’s Criminal Fraud Section and United States Attorney’s Office for a prominent advertising and marketing agency concerning allegations that the company insiders improperly obtained and used Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) funds.</li></ul><h4>Sanctions, Export Control, & Foreign Investment</h4>As Counsel to the Assistant Attorney General, Brandon oversaw every criminal investigation involving export control and sanctions and led the DOJ’s response to the Obama Administration’s rollback of sanctions targeting Iran—the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). As a Trial Attorney, he prosecuted more than 30 export control and sanctions cases, including first-ever cases involving North Korea, weapons of mass destruction, and the Atomic Energy Act. In the first Trump Administration, Brandon led DOJ’s review of transactions involving foreign influence before CFIUS and Team Telecom; he also managed the DOJ’s review of transactions before CFIUS during the Obama Administration. A selection of Brandon’s sanctions, export control, & foreign investment experience includes:<ul><li>Obtained declination from DOJ and Department of State for individual accused of violating the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) and brokering.  </li><li>Obtained declination from DOJ for CEO of a global technology company subject to criminal and civil investigations into alleged violations of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR).</li><li>Obtained license on an expedited timeline from the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) for a U.S. technology and manufacturing company to winddown operations in Russia.</li><li>Represent global retailer to conduct internal investigation and draft disclosures to civil authorities pertaining to potential apparent violations of U.S. sanctions and export controls laws.</li><li>Developed U.S. sanctions compliance program for artificial intelligence company and advised on implementation, including ongoing support for compliance processes and procedures.</li><li>Led internal investigation and submitted response to OFAC subpoena for software development company regarding potential violations of multiple sanctions programs; obtained cautionary letter.</li><li>Conducted international investigation concerning federal and state material support statutes as well as related sanctions issues for prominent international organization.</li><li>Represented cryptocurrency exchange before CFIUS in one of the largest cryptocurrency-related transactions and first filing involving digital assets before the Committee.</li><li>Represented Kahoot!, a global learning platform company based in Norway, in CFIUS matters related to its acquisition of Clever Inc.</li><li>Successfully petitioned Customs and Border Protection (CBP) for the release of seized property and resolved related export control disclosures with the Department of State with a “no action” letter.  </li></ul><h4>FARA & the Lobbying Disclosure Act</h4>As Chief of the FARA Unit in the first Trump Administration, and the first official to supervise all foreign influence matters across the DOJ, Brandon revitalized and transformed the enforcement of FARA. Following the DOJ’s announcement making FARA an enforcement priority, he supervised a team of 40 attorneys and staff that opened a record number of investigations, pursued a record number of enforcement actions, secured a record number of registrations, and obtained the first civil injunction involving FARA in nearly three decades. Brandon also directed the review of Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings for criminal violations and regulated the exemption under FARA for LDA registrants. He also wrote the book on FARA enforcement for the American Bar Association. A selection of Brandon’s FARA & Lobbying Disclosure Act experience includes:<ul><li>Obtained first-ever closure letter from DOJ FARA Unit for a technology company under investigation for potential FARA violations.</li><li>Obtained declination from DOJ for sports organization in connection with a FARA investigation. </li></ul><h4>Cybersecurity </h4>As a long-time prosecutor, including as a Special Assistant U.S. Attorney for the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia, Brandon directed complex cyber investigations, including multiple matters involving state-sponsored cyber attacks. He prosecuted the first person convicted as a cyberterrorist and led the investigation of an international hacking group for identity theft, extortion, and dozens of spearphishing attacks against public and private entities. He also collaborated with other government agencies, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission, Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Department of Homeland Security, to facilitate cooperation from corporate victims and disseminate threat information. A selection of Brandon’s cybersecurity experience includes:<ul><li>Obtained assistance from FBI and local enforcement for a data and analytics firm to disrupt cyber-enabled campaign of former employee targeting customers.</li></ul>During his time at the DOJ, Brandon handled the entire range of national security matters. He led and supervised investigations and prosecutions involving espionage, economic espionage, mishandling of classified information, and theft of trade secrets. He also directed investigations involving treason, mutiny, the Neutrality Act, and the Logan Act, and worked closely with the Department of Education on matters pertaining foreign influence, foreign funding, and national security.Brandon has been widely recognized for his deep experience in handling national security matters, and keynotes and speaks at industry conferences involving export control and sanctions, CFIUS, FARA, and political law. He has received numerous awards for his work, including the Attorney General’s Award for Distinguished Service (2018), the FBI Director’s Award for Outstanding Cyber Investigation (2017), the Director of National Counterintelligence’s Award for Excellence (2019), the Homeland Security Investigations Executive Associate Director’s Award for Outstanding Counterproliferation Investigation (2014), and five awards from the Assistant Attorney General for National Security.Brandon regularly provides insight on national security issues and DOJ matters with national media. He is a frequent contributor on cable news, including MSNBC’s The Rachel Maddow Show, Deadline: Whitehouse and All In with Chris Hayes, ABC's Good Morning America, NBC's Meet the Press, CNN, BBC News, Sky News and NHK World. He also regularly appears on NPR’s Morning Edition. He has been quoted on a variety of national security topics in the Wall Street Journal, New York Times, and Washington Post, among others,Brandon is also a Contributing Editor to the Lawfare blog and co-host of <a href="https://www.lawfaremedia.org/podcasts-multimedia/podcast/the-regulators-series" target="_blank">The Regulators</a> podcast, where he speaks with key U.S. government regulators in the national security space, including leaders at OFAC, CFIUS, the Bureau of Industry and Security, DOJ, FinCEN, the Office of Information and Communications Technology and Services (ICTS), and FBI.

Brandon L. Van Grack

Partner