“ Whether it’s planning for new product development, helping with recalling an existing product, or defending against product liability or consumer class actions – I’m right there with my clients, providing end–to–end protection for their products.
Julie protects her clients’ products throughout the product life cycle. Drawing on her deep technical and legal experience, she counsels clients on consumer product safety regulation and pharmaceutical and medical device preemption. She manages complex and multijurisdictional litigation both in state and federal court and also guides clients through product recalls.
Clients appreciate Julie’s ability to assess both the practical business implications and legal impact of a matter. They also value the way she recommends solutions that meet their objectives.
Julie is committed to providing thought leadership for her clients. She is an editor of, and frequent contributor to, MoFo’s Class Dismissed blog, where she provides insights on class action and product–related issues affecting companies in the consumer arena. She has been recognized for her writing as a top author in the JD Supra Readers’ Choice Awards, 2016–2019.
Julie is also committed to pro bono service and diversity in the legal profession. While at Harvard Law School, she worked at the Harvard Legal Aid Bureau, a nonprofit law firm that provides free legal services. She has continued her pro bono work at MoFo, which has resulted in being a regular recipient of the Wiley W. Manuel Award from the California State Bar for pro bono contributions. She is a member of MoFo’s Diversity Strategy Committee and has served on the Associates Steering Committee of Athena San Diego, an organization that promotes professional growth for women executives and rising managers in science and technology.
More About Julie
Julie brings an industry perspective to her work with MoFo. Before going to law school, she was a medicinal chemist at Pfizer, where she researched cancer drugs.
Beyond her impressive legal work, Julie has a life in the arts. She is a professional–level violinist who performs with chamber music groups in the San Diego area and has played with the Harvard–Radcliffe Orchestra, Cambridge University Chamber Orchestra, and La Jolla Symphony.Show More
Serve as co–lead national product liability counsel, providing broad–based support on product development, in addition to serving as lead counsel in a number of product liability litigation matters filed around the country.
Represent a children’s monthly subscription service, regarding regulatory compliance for product safety. Represented the client before the U.S. Consumer Safety Product Commission (CPSC) in voluntary recall.
Represent a fertility company, and one of its subsidiaries, in mass tort and class action litigation arising out of a freezer tank failure at Pacific Fertility Center.
Advise company on new products coming to market as part of a private label licensing business including diverse product lines such as personal care products, children’s furniture, automotive accessories, and educational supplies.
Advise start–up on product liability risk assessment and mitigation associated with Internet of Things and product misuse.
Defended company in a class action alleging that a wearable device does not accurately track sleep as advertised and in two class actions alleging that Fitbit’s heart rate monitoring does not work as advertised. The heart rate monitoring class actions have spawned securities class actions against the company and we are coordinating the interplay between both sets of cases.
Serve as national coordinating counsel for Fitbit in five class action lawsuits and over 30 personal injury lawsuits arising from the widely publicized recall of Fitbit’s Force activity tracker. We successfully conducted the recall in a short timeframe and negotiated a quick and favorable settlement of the class action litigation. We also represent Fitbit in a class action alleging that a wearable device does not accurately track sleep as advertised and in two class actions alleging that Fitbit’s heart rate monitoring does not work as advertised. The heart rate monitoring class actions have spawned securities class actions against the company and we are coordinating the interplay between both sets of cases.
Chambers USA 2021
The Daily Journal 2019
JD Supra 2016–2021
Legal 500 US 2016–2019
Legal 500 US 2017–2020
Legal 500 2018–2019
Super Lawyers 2015–2018
Legal 500 US 2020