In 2012, the state’s own literacy experts, convened by Defendants State Board of Education and Superintendent Torlakson, documented a crisis in literacy in California’s system of public schools, and issued a report, called the Striving Readers Comprehensive Literacy Plan (SRCL Plan), providing a framework for how the State could go about addressing the literacy crisis. This plan provides a framework and more detail on implementation of the aspects of literacy education described below.
Education experts and researchers agree that developing the literacy necessary to succeed in the twenty-first century requires not just the skill to decode letters and words, but the ability to read and write to access knowledge and communicate with the world. These essential “knowledge capabilities—which include the ability to compose, comprehend, synthesize, reflect upon, and critique—require conscious and sustained development throughout primary and secondary schooling.”
Twenty-first century literacy includes:
Literacy development is progressive and cumulative, and evidence-based instruction is required throughout the primary and secondary years in order to attain the level of functional adult literacy necessary to function as an adult in society, including participation in the economy, political process, and other activities of citizenship.
Because literacy development is cumulative, students who have been denied the opportunity to attain literacy fall further behind with each year of schooling. For example, students with low reading-comprehension skills have trouble progressing further in school because they cannot read grade-appropriate texts. There are very few books written at a third-grade reading level that are cognitively appropriate for high-school-aged students, so students who are behind in their literacy development often cannot read texts that can engage and educate them with high school content.
Failure to engage students with interesting and developmentally appropriate content relevant to their lives then deters students from investing in further development of their literacy skills, causing students to fall even farther behind.
In 2012, the state’s own literacy experts, convened by Defendants State Board of Education and Superintendent Torlakson, documented a crisis in literacy in California’s system of public schools, and issued a report, called the Striving Readers Comprehensive Literacy Plan (SRCL Plan), providing a framework for how the State could go about addressing the literacy crisis. This plan provides more detail on implementation of the aspects of literacy education described below.
Educators know how to teach literacy. Here is how:
More detailed information on teaching literacy.
There are many models of successful, evidence-based literacy programs. The U.S. Department of Education’s Institute of Educational Sciences maintains the What Works Clearinghouse, which presents and reviews the effectiveness of literacy programs using a consistent and transparent set of standards. Find out what works!
Catherine Snow, Preventing Reading Difficulties in Young Children
Nell K. Duke and Meghan K. Block, Improving Reading in the Primary Grades
Catherine Snow and Gina Biancarosa, Reading Next: A Vision for Action and Research in Middle and High School Literacy
 See generally Catherine Snow et al., Preventing Reading Difficulties in Young Children (1998).
©1996-2019 Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved.