Morrison Foerster is an international law firm with lawyers practicing throughout the United States, Asia, and Europe. Click to discover more.

mofo_share_image.jpg

Morrison Foerster

favicon.ico

favicon-16x16.png

favicon-32x32.png

apple-touch-icon.png

MoFo Favicons

Terms / Notices

Cookies

Privacy Policy

Attorney Advertising

Secure Login

Alumni

  Facebook

MoFo Facebook

  Linkedin

MoFo LinkedIN

Twitter

MoFo Twitter

YouTube

MoFo Youtube

Morrison Foerster - Footer

You have not solved the recaptcha challenge yet or session expired, try again.

Disclaimer

Unsolicited e-mails and information sent to Morrison & Foerster will not be considered confidential, may be disclosed to others pursuant to our <a href="https://www.mofo.com/about/privacy-policy.html">Privacy Policy</a>, may not receive a response, and do not create an attorney-client relationship with Morrison & Foerster. If you are not already a client of Morrison & Foerster, do not include any confidential information in this message. Also, please note that our attorneys do not seek to practice law in any jurisdiction in which they are not properly authorized to do so.

Feedback

mofo-logo-2022.svg

People

Capabilities

Resources

About

Culture

Offices

Careers

Stay Connected

On November 18, 2019, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) took action to reaffirm the “valid when made” doctrine in response to the uncertainty on the validity of interest rates of bank-originated loans sold in the secondary market after the 2015 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s decision in Madden v. Midland Funding LLC (Madden).

After Madden, OCC and FDIC Propose to Reaffirm “Valid When Made” Rule

About Morrison Forester

people-default-header-desktop.jpg

people-default-header-mobile.jpg

Default Meta Data

On November 18, 2019, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) <a target="_blank" href="https://www.occ.gov/news-issuances/news-releases/2019/nr-occ-2019-132.html">took action</a> to reaffirm the “valid when made” doctrine in response to the uncertainty on the validity of interest rates of bank-originated loans sold in the secondary market after the 2015 decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Madden v. Midland Funding LLC (Madden). The <a target="_blank" href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-11-21/pdf/2019-25280.pdf">OCC issued a notice of proposed rulemaking</a> to clarify that when a bank sells, assigns, or otherwise transfers a loan, the interest permissible prior to the transfer would continue to be permissible following the transfer. The long-recognized, common law principle “valid when made” provides that loan terms that are valid when made remain valid loan terms until the loan is satisfied or forgiven, irrespective of whether, or to whom, the loan is sold. The OCC’s proposed rule would make it explicit that the terms of permissible loans will not be affected by the sale, assignment, or other transfer of those loans. While the proposed rule would expressly codify what the OCC says it has always believed about the impact of an assignment on the permissible interest, the proposed rule would not address which entity is the “true lender” when a bank makes a loan and assigns or sells the loan or receivables to a third party. Therefore, recent cases finding that the party with the “predominant economic interest” is the “true lender” could continue to create uncertainty for marketplace lenders or others in the secondary market.  To maintain parity between national banks and state banks with respect to interest rate authority, on November 19, 2019, the <a target="_blank" href="https://www.fdic.gov/news/board/2019/2019-11-19-notice-dis-c-fr.pdf">Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) issued a notice of proposed rulemaking</a> seeking to reaffirm the authority for assignees of loans originated by state banks to enforce the contractual interest-rate terms of those loans. Like the OCC, the FDIC also does not address the “true lender” question; however, the FDIC specified that “it will view unfavorably entities that partner with a [s]tate bank with the sole goal of evading a lower interest rate established under the law of the entity’s licensing [s]tate(s).”Both  proposed rules follow Congressional inaction on federal “Madden fix” legislation, despite a July 2018 report by the Department of Treasury recommending that Congress codify the “valid when made” doctrine. The proposed rules by the OCC and the FDIC are an important development given that plaintiffs and state regulators have relied upon or cited the 2015 Madden ruling when seeking to challenge marketplace lending arrangements or other traditional secondary market loan sales. The OCC’s proposed rule would apply to all national banks and state and federal savings associations, and the FDIC’s proposed rule would extend this parity to state banks. Comments are due within 60 days after publication in the Federal Register; the OCC’s proposed rule is anticipated to be published on November 21, 2019.

After Madden, OCC and FDIC Propose to Reaffirm “Valid When Made” Rule

Sign Up

Crystal N. Kaldjob

Partner

Financial Services