Morrison Foerster is an international law firm with lawyers practicing throughout the United States, Asia, and Europe. Click to discover more.

mofo_share_image.jpg

Morrison Foerster

favicon.ico

favicon-16x16.png

favicon-32x32.png

apple-touch-icon.png

MoFo Favicons

Terms / Notices

Cookies

Privacy Policy

Attorney Advertising

Secure Login

Alumni

  Facebook

MoFo Facebook

  Linkedin

MoFo LinkedIN

Twitter

MoFo Twitter

YouTube

MoFo Youtube

Morrison Foerster - Footer

You have not solved the recaptcha challenge yet or session expired, try again.

Disclaimer

Unsolicited e-mails and information sent to Morrison Foerster will not be considered confidential, may be disclosed to others pursuant to our <a href="https://www.mofo.com/about/privacy-policy.html">Privacy Policy</a>, may not receive a response, and do not create an attorney-client relationship with Morrison Foerster. If you are not already a client of Morrison Foerster, do not include any confidential information in this message. Also, please note that our attorneys do not seek to practice law in any jurisdiction in which they are not properly authorized to do so.

Feedback

mofo-logo-2022.svg

People

Capabilities

Resources

About

Culture

Offices

Careers

Stay Connected

The U.S. Supreme Court will review a Montana Supreme Court decision holding that Montana residents represented by Morrison & Foerster can sue the Atlantic Richfield Co. (“ ARCO” ) for damages for pollution that ARCO caused despite the fact that ARCO has already spent significant time and money cleaning up the damage caused by its pollution.

Big Law Supreme Court Veterans Land 5 New Cases for Next Term

About Morrison Forester

people-default-header-desktop.jpg

people-default-header-mobile.jpg

Default Meta Data

The U.S. Supreme Court will review a Montana Supreme Court decision holding that Montana residents represented by Morrison & Foerster can sue the Atlantic Richfield Co. (“ ARCO” ) for damages for pollution that ARCO caused despite the fact that ARCO has already spent significant time and money cleaning up the damage caused by its pollution.ARCO, which worked with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for decades cleaning up the site, is arguing that the residents ’ claim for damages is barred by the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act, which gives the EPA sole authority over how a site should be restored.Subscription Required<a target="_blank" href="https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/2019/06/10/big-law-supreme-court-veterans-land-five-new-cases-for-next-term/">Read Full Article</a>