Morrison Foerster is an international law firm with lawyers practicing throughout the United States, Asia, and Europe. Click to discover more.

mofo_share_image.jpg

Morrison Foerster

favicon.ico

favicon-16x16.png

favicon-32x32.png

apple-touch-icon.png

MoFo Favicons

Terms / Notices

Cookies

Privacy Policy

Attorney Advertising

Secure Login

Alumni

  Facebook

MoFo Facebook

  Linkedin

MoFo LinkedIN

Twitter

MoFo Twitter

YouTube

MoFo Youtube

Morrison Foerster - Footer

You have not solved the recaptcha challenge yet or session expired, try again.

Email Disclaimer

Disclaimer

Unsolicited e-mails and information sent to Morrison Foerster will not be considered confidential, may be disclosed to others pursuant to our <a href="https://www.mofo.com/about/privacy-policy.html">Privacy Policy</a>, may not receive a response, and do not create an attorney-client relationship with Morrison Foerster. If you are not already a client of Morrison Foerster, do not include any confidential information in this message. Also, please note that our attorneys do not seek to practice law in any jurisdiction in which they are not properly authorized to do so.

Feedback

mofo-logo-2022.svg

People

Capabilities

Resources

About

Culture

Offices

Careers

Stay Connected

On February 19, 2020, a federal court ordered U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to overhaul the way the agency detains people in its custody in the Tucson Sector in Arizona. The court found that the conditions in CBP holding cells, especially those that preclude sleep over several nights, are presumptively punitive and violate the U.S. Constitution.

Federal Court Order Finds Conditions in Customs and Border Protection Detention Facilities Unconstitutional

About Morrison Forester

people-default-header-desktop.jpg

people-default-header-mobile.jpg

Default Meta Data

On February 19, 2020, a federal court ordered U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to overhaul the way the agency detains people in its custody in the Tucson Sector in Arizona. The court found that the conditions in CBP holding cells, especially those that preclude sleep over several nights, are presumptively punitive and violate the U.S. Constitution.This is the latest turn in a legal challenge, Doe v. Wolf, filed in June 2015 by the American Immigration Council, ACLU of Arizona, the National Immigration Law Center, the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area, and Morrison & Foerster.The February 19, 2020, court order enjoins CBP from holding detainees longer than 48 hours “unless and until CBP can provide conditions of confinement that meet detainees’ basic human needs for sleeping in a bed with a blanket, a shower, food that meets acceptable dietary standards, potable water, and medical assessment performed by a medical professional.”Morrison & Foerster partner Colette Reiner Mayer commented: “This is an excellent outcome and we look forward to its implementation. With the court’s order we have secured a permanent solution and hopefully the sickening conditions in these facilities will improve. After years of collecting evidence and preparing and trying this case, the border detention facilities will no longer be allowed to violate the Constitution. Civil detainees in Border Patrol stations have suffered for too long, and this decision will pave the way for systemic change across the country.”The MoFo pro bono trial team was led by Litigation partners Colette Reiner Mayer and Jack Londen, and included Litigation associates Pieter de Ganon, John Douglass, and Aaron Bray, along with numerous former associates over the last five years.Read the court's <a href="https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/sites/default/files/litigation_documents/doe_v_johnson_findings_of_fact_and_conclusions_of_law.pdf">findings of fact and conclusions of law</a> and <a href="https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/sites/default/files/litigation_documents/doe_v_johnson_judgment_in_a_civil_case.pdf">judgment</a>, and more information about the <a href="https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/litigation/challenging-unconstitutional-conditions-cbp-detention-facilities">Doe v. Wolf lawsuit</a>. Attorneys involved in the case and individuals formerly detained by CBP in the Tucson Sector held a telephonic press briefing following the court order. A <a href="https://www.nilc.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Doe-press-conference-2020-02-19.mp3.">recording of the briefing</a> is available.

Federal Court Order Finds Conditions in Customs and Border Protection Detention Facilities Unconstitutional