In The News

ITC May Be Willing to Wait on PTAB, If the Timing is Right


08 Sep 2020

Mark Whitaker spoke to Law360 about the U.S. International Trade Commission’s (ITC) suspension of the limited exclusion and cease and desist orders it issued against SZ DJI Technology Co. for violating Section 337 of the Tariff Act, signaling that it’s willing to suspend remedial orders in infringement cases where the Patent Trademark and Appeal Board (PTAB) has invalidated the patents at issue.

“The ITC and the PTAB have different statutory mandates, and they’re bound to conclude their own independent reviews [and] investigations,” Mark said. “What typically happens is that [when] a party [files] a petition for review at the PTAB, the ITC traditionally pays no attention to that because under their independent statute, there’s nothing in there that would cause them to pause or stay any investigation that’s going forward, unlike a district court.”

Mark told Law360 that the PTAB generally takes about 18 months to reach a decision, and the ITC takes 16-18 months, so making those timelines sync up as much as possible is key to getting a result like DJI’s.

“As soon as they get an inkling that they may be embroiled in an ITC case, or they’ve been given some notice that some patents may be asserted against them, they should start getting their ducks in a row and looking at IPRs as a route for assisting them,” he said.

Read the full article.



Unsolicited e-mails and information sent to Morrison & Foerster will not be considered confidential, may be disclosed to others pursuant to our Privacy Policy, may not receive a response, and do not create an attorney-client relationship with Morrison & Foerster. If you are not already a client of Morrison & Foerster, do not include any confidential information in this message. Also, please note that our attorneys do not seek to practice law in any jurisdiction in which they are not properly authorized to do so.