Shareholder Ruling Resolves Dual-Natured Claim Uncertainty


30 Sep 2021

Robert May, Christina Ademola, and Nitesh Daryanani authored an article for Law360 about the Delaware Supreme Court’s decision in Brookfield Asset Management Inc. v. Rosson, eliminating the ambiguity surrounding so-called dual-natured direct and derivative claims.

“The Brookfield decision removes a 15-year tension in the direct-derivative doctrine, clearing a path for greater certainty for corporate deal makers,” the authors wrote. “The key question to identify a direct claim is whether the stockholder has demonstrated that they have suffered an injury that is not dependent on an injury to the corporation.”

Read the full article.



Unsolicited e-mails and information sent to Morrison & Foerster will not be considered confidential, may be disclosed to others pursuant to our Privacy Policy, may not receive a response, and do not create an attorney-client relationship with Morrison & Foerster. If you are not already a client of Morrison & Foerster, do not include any confidential information in this message. Also, please note that our attorneys do not seek to practice law in any jurisdiction in which they are not properly authorized to do so.