In The News

How Will the Supreme Court Vote on LGBTQ Protections?

Human Resource Executive

10 Oct 2019

Morrison & Foerster of counsel Andrew Turnbull spoke to Human Resource Executive about the U.S. Supreme Court’s eventual decision on whether Title VII prohibits workplace discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.

The decision will be a close one, Andrew said, explaining that attorneys for the plaintiff employees involved argued that discriminating against a man for being attracted to another man or against a transgender worker for changing genders are both forms of sex stereotyping that fall under the court’s ruling in the 1989 Price Waterhouse case. However, according to Andrew, “employers’ attorneys and Solicitor General Noel Francisco, while recognizing Price Waterhouse as good law, claimed that ruling in favor of the employees would create new protected categories not covered by the definition of ‘sex’ under Title VII.”

Andrew added that regardless of the state and federal landscapes for LGBTQ employment protections, an increasing number of employers are instating policies that protect such workers from discrimination “because they recognize it is good business and helps them recruit and retain top talent.”



Unsolicited e-mails and information sent to Morrison & Foerster will not be considered confidential, may be disclosed to others pursuant to our Privacy Policy, may not receive a response, and do not create an attorney-client relationship with Morrison & Foerster. If you are not already a client of Morrison & Foerster, do not include any confidential information in this message. Also, please note that our attorneys do not seek to practice law in any jurisdiction in which they are not properly authorized to do so.